Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Assessing polyp size by improved digitalized computed tomography (CT)
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Production Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0105-4102
2008 (English)In: Anticancer Research, ISSN 0250-7005, E-ISSN 1791-7530, Vol. 28, no 3B, 1911-1915 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The size of colorectal polyps is important in the clinical management of these lesions. When using a conventional ruler (the tool of pathologists worldwide), we have previously found unacceptably high intra- and inter-observer variations in assessing the size of phantom polyps. The aim of this study was to assess the size of 12 phantom polyps by computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods: The size of phantom polyps as assessed by CT was compared to the gold standard size (GSS) measured at The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. Results: In 33.3% (n=4) of the 12 polyps and in 41.7% (n=25) of the 60 measurements, the mean CT size under- or overestimated the GSS by more than 1 mm. In 15%, or in 9 of the 60 measurements, the CT size was under- or overestimated by more than 2 mm. In polyp #5 the GSS size was 8.41 mm where the expected cancer-risk in adenomas is 1%. But 3 out of 5 CT measurements were >10 mm, where the expected cancer-risk in adenomas is 10%. In polyp #10 the GSS size was 10.20 mm where the expected cancer-risk is 10%. But 2 out of 5 CT measurements were <10 mm where the expected risk is only 1%. Conclusion: The size assessed by CT was more reliable than that obtained with a millimetre ruler using the same devices, inasmuch as the disparate individual deviation-values found with the latter method were avoided. The volume and the shape of the devices influenced size assessment of phantom polyps by CT.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 28, no 3B, 1911-1915 p.
Keyword [en]
polyps, size, computed tomography, colorectal polyps, colon, colonography, colonoscopy, surveillance, rectum, metaanalysis, reliability, polypectomy, accuracy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-17627ISI: 000256940700030Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-45949083316OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-17627DiVA: diva2:335671
Note
QC 20100525Available from: 2010-08-05 Created: 2010-08-05 Last updated: 2017-12-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Scopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mattsson, Lars
By organisation
Production Engineering
In the same journal
Anticancer Research

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 22 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf