Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Objective or Subjective 'Ought'?
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Philosophy.
2010 (English)In: Utilitas, ISSN 0953-8208, E-ISSN 1741-6183, Vol. 22, no 1, 33-35 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The prescriptive 'ought' has both an objective and a subjective interpretation. In the objective sense, what one ought to do depends on what is actually true. In the Subjective sense it depends on what one believes to be true. Ordinary usage seems to vacillate between these two interpretations. An example (the indecisive terrorist) is used to show that a subjective ought statement can have a determinate truth-value in situations where the corresponding objective ought statement has no truth-value, not even all unknowable one. Therefore the subjective ought is not definable in terms of the objective ought. However, definability in the other direction is not excluded by this argument.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 22, no 1, 33-35 p.
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-19231DOI: 10.1017/s0953820809990355ISI: 000274712000003ScopusID: 2-s2.0-79956357151OAI: diva2:337278
QC 20100525Available from: 2010-08-05 Created: 2010-08-05 Last updated: 2011-01-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hansson, Sven Ove
By organisation
In the same journal

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 22 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link