Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Optical measurements of flutter mode shapes
KTH, Superseded Departments, Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3337-1900
2000 (English)In: Journal of Aircraft, ISSN 0021-8669, E-ISSN 1533-3868, Vol. 37, no 5, 846-849 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The usefulness of an optical motion capture system in aeroelastic wind-tunnel testing is investigated. A system consisting of four infrared charge-coupled device cameras, observing flat passive reflecting markers, is installed in a low-speed tunnel to measure Butter mode shapes. Free vibration and aeroelastic measurements are performed on four wing configurations consisting of thin flat orthotropic composite laminates with varying laminate orientation. The laminate orientations are chosen to result in dissimilar flutter mode shapes. The wings are equipped with up to 20 markers, and the motion is sampled at 240 Wt. Quantitative scalar comparisons between analysis and experiments, with respect to both amplitude and phase are done using the modal assurance criterion (MAC). Measurements of mode shapes on free vibrating wings (ground vibration tests), as well as limit-cycle Butter oscillations, show good agreement with numerical results. MAC ratings consistently exceeding 0.96 are achieved, However, it is clearly seen that the agreement is better for free vibration comparisons than for Butter This is expected considering the higher complexity of the Butter problem. Thus, the cause cannot be attributed exclusively to insufficiencies in the optical system but also to inaccuracies in the modeling. The good quality of the measurements proves the usefulness of such a noncontact positioning system in experimental wind-tunnel testing, not only in the present flutter context, but in a variety of experimental work affected by aeroelastic deformation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2000. Vol. 37, no 5, 846-849 p.
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-20079ISI: 000089726400014OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-20079DiVA: diva2:338772
Note
QC 20100525Available from: 2010-08-10 Created: 2010-08-10 Last updated: 2017-12-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Kuttenkeuler, Jakob

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kuttenkeuler, Jakob
By organisation
Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering
In the same journal
Journal of Aircraft

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 55 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf