Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Load and resistance factor design (LRFD) for driven piles using dynamic methods - A Florida perspective
Show others and affiliations
2000 (English)In: ASTM geotechnical testing journal, ISSN 0149-6115, Vol. 23, no 1, 55-66 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The parameters for load and resistance factor design (LRFD) of driven piles using dynamic methods are presented based on a database of 218 pile cases in Florida. Eight dynamic methods were studied: ENR, modified ENR, FDOT, and Gates driving formulas, Case Analysis with Wave Analysis Program (CAPWAP), Case Method for Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA), Paikowsky's energy method, and Sakai's energy method. It was demonstrated that the modern methods based on wave mechanics, such as CAPWAP, PDA, and Paikowsky's energy methods, are roughly twice as cost effective to reach the target reliability indices of 2.0 to 2.5 (failure probability = 0.62 to 2.5%) as the ENR and modified ENR driving formulas. The Gates formula, when used separately on piles with Davisson capacities smaller or larger than 1779 kN, has an accuracy comparable to the modem methods. The utilizable measured Davisson capacity, defined as phi/lambda (ratio of resistance/mean capacity) obtained from testing at beginning of redrive (BOR), is only slightly larger than the end of drive (EOD) values. Furthermore, past practice with driving formulas reveals the existence of a large redundancy in pile groups against failure. The latter suggests the use of a lower relatively reliability target index, B-T = 2.0 (p(f) = 2.5%) for single pile design. Also, the utilizable measured Davisson capacity, phi/lambda, for all the dynamic methods studied, is quite similar to published values (Lai et al. 1995; Sid; 1985) for static estimates from in situ tests.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
American Society for Testing and Materials , 2000. Vol. 23, no 1, 55-66 p.
Keyword [en]
pile foundation, pile driving, reliability, load and resistance factor design
National Category
Civil Engineering
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-21079ISI: 000172016600006OAI: diva2:339776

QC 20100525

Available from: 2010-08-10 Created: 2010-08-10 Last updated: 2013-03-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Birgisson, Björn
In the same journal
ASTM geotechnical testing journal
Civil Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 34 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link