Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Managing knowledge in the dark: An empirical study of the reliability of capability evaluations
2004 (English)In: Management science, ISSN 0025-1909, E-ISSN 1526-5501, Vol. 50, no 11, 1491-1503 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

If knowledge is to be managed and transferred, it is essential that members of organizations know and agree on where capabilities reside. Few studies, however, have examined the difficulties of evaluating capabilities in large firms. This paper reports an in-depth empirical study of capabilities central to knowledge management efforts in large leading multinational companies. The results show that evaluation of these capabilities is a complex task. The median interrater correlation for capabilities designated as strategic by top management is only 0.28. Analysis of the determinants of reliability show that the difference in evaluations is largest for subsidiaries managers know less about, for younger subsidiaries, and for subsidiaries in less important markets. The results of our empirical study have important implications for creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge in organizations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. Vol. 50, no 11, 1491-1503 p.
Keyword [en]
knowledge management, capabilities, interrater reliability, job-performance ratings, multinational-corporations, firm, innovation, validity
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-23878ISI: 000225126600003OAI: diva2:342577
QC 20100525Available from: 2010-08-10 Created: 2010-08-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Arvidsson, Niklas
In the same journal
Management science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 240 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link