Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Weighing risks and benefits
KTH, Superseded Departments, History of Science and Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0071-3919
2004 (English)In: Topoi (Dordrecht), ISSN 0167-7411, E-ISSN 1572-8749, Vol. 23, no 2, 145-152 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

It is almost universally acknowledged that risks have to be weighed against benefits, but there are different ways to perform the weighing. In conventional risk analysis, collectivist risk-weighing is the standard. This means that an option is accepted if the sum of all individual benefits outweighs the sum of all individual risks. In practices originating in clinical medicine, such as ethical appraisals of clinical trials, individualist risk-weighing is the standard. This implies a much stricter criterion for risk acceptance, namely that the risk to which each individual is exposed should be outweighed by benefits for that same individual. The different choices of risk-weighing methods in different policy areas seem to have emerged from traditional thought patterns and social relations, rather than from explicit deliberations on possible justifications for the alternative ways to weigh risks against benefits. It is not obvious how the prevalent differences in risk-weighing practices can be reconstructed in terms of consistent underlying principles of preventive health or social priority-setting.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. Vol. 23, no 2, 145-152 p.
Keyword [en]
threshold limit values, controlled-trials, uncertainty principle, community-equipoise, clinical equipoise, ethics, neednt
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-23925ISI: 000225456500002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-23925DiVA: diva2:342624
Note
QC 20100525 QC 20111101Available from: 2010-08-10 Created: 2010-08-10 Last updated: 2017-12-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hansson, Sven Ove
By organisation
History of Science and Technology
In the same journal
Topoi (Dordrecht)
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 65 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf