Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
European public advice on nanobiotechnology - Four convergence seminars
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Philosophy and History of Technology, Philosophy.
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Philosophy and History of Technology, Philosophy.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0071-3919
2009 (English)In: NanoEthics, ISSN 1871-4757, Vol. 3, no 1, 43-59 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In order to explore public views on nanobiotechnology (NBT), convergence seminars were held in four places in Europe; namely in Visby (Sweden), Sheffield (UK), Lublin (Poland), and Porto (Portugal). A convergence seminar is a new form of public participatory activity that can be used to deal systematically with the uncertainty associated for instance with the development of an emerging technology like nanobiotechnology. In its first phase, the participants are divided into three "scenario groups" that discuss different future scenarios. In the second phase, the participants are regrouped into three "convergence groups", each of which contains representatives from each of the three groups from the first phase. In the final third phase, all participants meet for a summary discussion. This pilot project had two aims: (1) to develop and assess the new methodology and (2) to gather advice and recommendations from the public that may be useful for future decisions on nanobiotechnology (NBT). Participants emphasized that they wanted the technology to focus on solutions to environmental and medical problems and to meet the needs of developing countries. The need for further public participation and deliberation on NBT issues seemed to be acknowledged by all participants. Many of them also raised equality concerns. Views on the means by which NBT should be steered into socially useful directions were more divided. In particular, different views were expressed on how much regulation of company activities is needed to curb unwanted developments. The participants' responses in a questionnaire indicate that the methodology of the convergence seminars was successful for decision-making under uncertainty. In particular, the participants stated that their advice was influenced both by access to different possible future developments and by the points of view of their co-participants, which is what the method is specifically intended to achieve.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 3, no 1, 43-59 p.
Keyword [en]
Convergence seminars, Ethics, Future studies, Hypothetical retrospection, Nanobiotechnology, Nanotechnology, Public participation, Technology assessment
National Category
Humanities
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-25196DOI: 10.1007/s11569-009-0054-2Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-64249102083OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-25196DiVA: diva2:356411
Note
QC 20101012Available from: 2010-10-12 Created: 2010-10-12 Last updated: 2012-03-02Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Philosophical and empirical investigations in nanoethics
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Philosophical and empirical investigations in nanoethics
2009 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2009. vi, 13 p.
Series
Theses in philosophy from the Royal Institute of Technology, ISSN 1650-8831 ; 32
National Category
Philosophy, Ethics and Religion
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-10543 (URN)978-91-7415-250-0 (ISBN)
Presentation
2009-05-18, Seminarierummet, Avd för filosofi, KTH, Teknikringen 78B, Stockholm, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

QC 20170118

Available from: 2009-05-25 Created: 2009-05-25 Last updated: 2017-01-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Godman, MarionHansson, Sven Ove
By organisation
Philosophy
Humanities

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 64 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf