Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Models for waste life cycle assessment: Review of technical assumptions
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Urban Planning and Environment, Environmental Strategies.
Show others and affiliations
2010 (English)In: Waste Management, ISSN 0956-053X, E-ISSN 1879-2456, Vol. 30, no 12, 2636-2648 p.Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A number of waste life cycle assessment (LCA) models have been gradually developed since the early 1990s, in a number of countries, usually independently from each other. Large discrepancies in results have been observed among different waste LCA models, although it has also been shown that results from different LCA studies can be consistent. This paper is an attempt to identify, review and analyse methodologies and technical assumptions used in various parts of selected waste LCA models. Several criteria were identified, which could have significant impacts on the results, such as the functional unit, system boundaries, waste composition and energy modelling. The modelling assumptions of waste management processes, ranging from collection, transportation, intermediate facilities, recycling, thermal treatment, biological treatment, and landfilling, are obviously critical when comparing waste LCA models. This review infers that some of the differences in waste LCA models are inherent to the time they were developed. It is expected that models developed later, benefit from past modelling assumptions and knowledge and issues. Models developed in different countries furthermore rely on geographic specificities that have an impact on the results of waste LCA models. The review concludes that more effort should be employed to harmonise and validate non-geographic assumptions to strengthen waste LCA modelling.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 30, no 12, 2636-2648 p.
Keyword [en]
DECISION-SUPPORT TOOL, POLLUTION-CONTROL RESIDUES, SOLID-WASTE, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS, ORGANIC WASTE, PART 1, INCINERATION, LCA, TECHNOLOGIES
National Category
Other Environmental Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-27042DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.06.004ISI: 000283909100028Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-77957656697OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-27042DiVA: diva2:375771
Note
QC 20101209Available from: 2010-12-09 Created: 2010-12-06 Last updated: 2010-12-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Finnveden, Göran
By organisation
Environmental Strategies
In the same journal
Waste Management
Other Environmental Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 148 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf