Ion Channel Density Regulates Switches between Regular and Fast Spiking in Soma but Not in Axons
2010 (English)In: PloS Computational Biology, ISSN 1553-734X, E-ISSN 1553-7358, Vol. 6, no 4, e1000753- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
The threshold firing frequency of a neuron is a characterizing feature of its dynamical behaviour, in turn determining its role in the oscillatory activity of the brain. Two main types of dynamics have been identified in brain neurons. Type 1 dynamics (regular spiking) shows a continuous relationship between frequency and stimulation current (f-I-stim) and, thus, an arbitrarily low frequency at threshold current; Type 2 (fast spiking) shows a discontinuous f-I-stim relationship and a minimum threshold frequency. In a previous study of a hippocampal neuron model, we demonstrated that its dynamics could be of both Type 1 and Type 2, depending on ion channel density. In the present study we analyse the effect of varying channel density on threshold firing frequency on two well-studied axon membranes, namely the frog myelinated axon and the squid giant axon. Moreover, we analyse the hippocampal neuron model in more detail. The models are all based on voltage-clamp studies, thus comprising experimentally measurable parameters. The choice of analysing effects of channel density modifications is due to their physiological and pharmacological relevance. We show, using bifurcation analysis, that both axon models display exclusively Type 2 dynamics, independently of ion channel density. Nevertheless, both models have a region in the channel-density plane characterized by an N-shaped steady-state current-voltage relationship (a prerequisite for Type 1 dynamics and associated with this type of dynamics in the hippocampal model). In summary, our results suggest that the hippocampal soma and the two axon membranes represent two distinct kinds of membranes; membranes with a channel-density dependent switching between Type 1 and 2 dynamics, and membranes with a channel-density independent dynamics. The difference between the two membrane types suggests functional differences, compatible with a more flexible role of the soma membrane than that of the axon membrane.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 6, no 4, e1000753- p.
ACTION-POTENTIAL GENERATION, CORTICAL PYRAMIDAL NEURONS, RAT SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX, PHASE RESETTING CURVES, MYELINATED NERVE FIBRE, VOLTAGE-CLAMP, MEMBRANE CURRENTS, CHOLINERGIC NEUROMODULATION, SUBTHRESHOLD OSCILLATIONS, INTRINSIC EXCITABILITY
Physiology Other Physics Topics
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-27566DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000753ISI: 000278125300029ScopusID: 2-s2.0-77954590665OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-27566DiVA: diva2:378078
QC 201012152010-12-152010-12-132010-12-15Bibliographically approved