Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
The public procurement phase with partnering and the actors’perception of the concept – results from a questionnaire
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Real Estate and Construction Management, Building and Real Estate Economics.
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This paper has the purpose of empirically mapping out the procurement phase withpartnering and investigate how the perception of partnering depend on; age, type of projectand whether the respondent is a client or contractor. The partnering flower (Nyström 2005a)will also be tested empirically. Data were collected through a questionnaire and consists of 18Swedish partnering projects from the construction industry, procured with competitivetendering under the Public Procurement Act. Both clients and contractors from the projectsresponded, summing up to a total of 30 observations. The results show that most projects usedincentive contracts with target costs and included soft parameters in the bid evaluation.Concerning the perception of partnering, the concept seems to have most potential inachieving cost reductions. There was also a large consensus among the respondents thatpartnering did not deteriorate the businesslike relationships nor was a less fun way of workingand that the concept has a future in the construction industry. A few major differences couldbe observed within the divided groups. The clients were more sceptical seeing themselves aswinners of partnering, in comparison to the contractors perception on the same subject.Concerning partnering being a more fun way of working the respondents from maintenanceprojects were not as positive as the respondents from the other types of projects, newinvestmentand re-investment. It could also be seen that the younger respondents were morepositive than the older concerning partnering being a way to resolve conflicts and not seeingthe concept just as a fad. Support for the partnering flower could be found in the materialsince all respondents considered trust and common goals important components of partnering.

Keyword [en]
Partnering, procurement, empirical study, partnering flower
National Category
Social Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-27637OAI: diva2:379219
QC 20101217Available from: 2010-12-17 Created: 2010-12-17 Last updated: 2010-12-17Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Partnering: definition, theory and the procurement phase
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Partnering: definition, theory and the procurement phase
2005 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other scientific)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH, 2005. 6, 17, 21, 33 p.
TRITA-BFE, ISSN 1104-4101 ; 05:64
Social sciences, partnering, construction, definition, SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP
National Category
Social Sciences
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-297 (URN)91-975358-2-6 (ISBN)

QC 20141024

Available from: 2005-07-11 Created: 2005-07-11 Last updated: 2014-10-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nyström, Johan
By organisation
Building and Real Estate Economics
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 55 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link