Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Standard Unstructured Grid Solutions for Cranked Arrow Wing Aerodynamics Project International F-16XL
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering.
Show others and affiliations
2009 (English)In: Journal of Aircraft, ISSN 0021-8669, Vol. 46, no 2, 385-408 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Steady and unsteady viscous flow simulations of a full-scale, semispan, and full-span model of the F-16XL-1 aircraft are performed with three different computational fluid dynamics codes using a common unstructured grid. Six different flight conditions are considered. They represent Reynolds and Mach number combinations at subsonic speeds, with and without sideslip. The steady computations of the flow at these flight conditions are made with several Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes turbulence models of different complexity. Detached-eddy simulation, delayed detached-eddy simulation, and an algebraic hybrid Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes/large-eddy simulation model are used to quantify unsteady effects at the same flight conditions. The computed results are compared with flight-test data in the form of surface pressures, skin friction, and boundary-layer velocity profiles. The focus of the comparison is on turbulence modeling effects and effects of unsteadiness. The overall agreement with flight data is good, with no clear trend as to which physical modeling approach is superior for this class of flow. The Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes turbulence models perform well in predicting the flow in an average sense. However, some of the flow conditions involve locally unsteady flow over the aircraft, which are held responsible for the scatter between the different turbulence modeling approaches. The detached-eddy simulations are able to quantify the unsteady effects, although they are not consistently better than the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes turbulence models in predicting the flow in an average sense in these flow regions. Detached-eddy simulation fails to predict boundary-layer profiles consistently over a range of flow regimes, with delayed detached-eddy simulation and hybrid Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes/large-eddy simulation models offering a remedy to recover some of the predictive capabilities of the underlying Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes turbulence model. Nonetheless, the confidence in the predictive capabilities of the computational fluid dynamics codes with regard to complex vortical flowfields around high-performance aircraft of this planform increased significantly during this study.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 46, no 2, 385-408 p.
National Category
Vehicle Engineering
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-32357DOI: 10.2514/1.35163ISI: 000264858800005ScopusID: 2-s2.0-63349111617OAI: diva2:410243
QC 20110413Available from: 2011-04-13 Created: 2011-04-13 Last updated: 2011-04-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Görtz, Stefan
By organisation
Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering
In the same journal
Journal of Aircraft
Vehicle Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 34 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link