Do we Need a Special Ethics for Research?
2011 (English)In: Science and Engineering Ethics, ISSN 1353-3452, E-ISSN 1471-5546, Vol. 17, no 1, 21-29 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Research is subject to more stringent ethical requirements than most other human activities, and a procedure that is otherwise allowed may be forbidden in research. Hence, risk-taking is more restricted in scientific research than in most non-research contexts, and privacy is better protected in scientific questionnaires than in marketing surveys. Potential arguments for this difference are scrutinized. The case in its favour appears to be weak. A stronger case can be made in favour of a difference in the opposite direction: If perilous or otherwise problematic activities have to be performed it is usually better to perform them in a research context where they are properly evaluated so that guidance is obtained for the future. However, retreating from current ethical demands on research is not a desirable direction to go. Instead, research ethics can serve to inspire the introduction of more stringent ethical principles in other social sectors.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. Vol. 17, no 1, 21-29 p.
Research ethics, Boundary problem, Applied ethics, Professional ethics, Clinical trials, Military ethics, Data mining, Privacy, Risk
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-32597DOI: 10.1007/s11948-009-9186-6ISI: 000287511800002ScopusID: 2-s2.0-77955317881OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-32597DiVA: diva2:412079
QC 201104202011-04-202011-04-182011-04-20Bibliographically approved