Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Application of flexibility analysis for design of tensegrity structures
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Mechanics, Structural Mechanics.
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Mechanics, Structural Mechanics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5819-4544
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Mechanics, Structural Mechanics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6802-8331
2011 (English)In: Proceeding of the 4th Structural Engineering World Congress, 2011Conference paper, Published paper (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
Abstract [en]

Tensegrity structures have been the subject of research for many years, but very few of them have been built. One major disadvantage of tensegrities compared to typical trusses is their stiffness, which can be significantly reduced when a cable goes slack. This paper aims to introduce a method for stiffness characterization of tensegrity structures for the following purposes: (i) comparison of the stiffness of tensegrity structures with other truss structures, (ii) comparison of the stiffness of different form-found geometries, (iii) finding the most flexible nodes and the principal flexibility directions and (iv) finding stiffness effects of different pre-stress levels and patterns. The method is based on the flexibility analysis of tensegrity structures and the finite element method is used for the non-linear static analysis of the structure to obtain the flexibility figures which visualize the flexibility for different plane and spatial truss and slender boom tensegrity structures.

 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011.
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-34037OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-34037DiVA, id: diva2:418850
Note
QC 20110524Available from: 2011-05-24 Created: 2011-05-24 Last updated: 2012-09-04Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Stiffness modification of tensegrity structures
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Stiffness modification of tensegrity structures
2011 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Although the concept of tensegrity structures was invented in the beginning of the twentieth century, the applications of these structures are limited, partially due to their low stiffness. The stiffness of tensegrities comes from topology, configuration, pre-stress and initial axial element stiffnesses.

 The first part of the present work is concerned with finding the magnitude of pre-stress. Its role in stiffness of tensegrity structures is to postpone the slackening of cables. A high pre-stress could result in instability of the structure due to buckling and yielding of compressive and tension elements, respectively. Tensegrity structures are subjected to various external loads such as self-weight, wind or snow loads which in turn could act in different directions and be of different magnitudes. Flexibility analysis is used to find the critical load combinations. The magnitude of pre-stress, in order to sustain large external loads, is obtained through flexibility figures, and flexibility ellipsoids are employed to ensure enough stiffness of the structure when disturbances are applied to a loaded structure.

 It has been seen that the most flexible direction is very much sensitive to the pre-stress magnitude and neither analytical methods nor flexibility ellipsoids are able to find the most flexible directions. The flexibility figures from a non-linear analysis are here utilized to find the weak directions.

 In the second part of the present work, a strategy is developed to compare tensegrity booms of triangular prism and Snelson types with a truss boom. It is found that tensegrity structures are less stiff than a truss boom when a transversal load is applied. An optimization approach is employed to find the placement of the actuators and their minimum length variations. The results show that the bending stiffness can be significantly improved, but still an active tensegrity boom is less stiff than a truss boom. Genetic algorithm shows high accuracy of searching non-structural space.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2011. p. viii, 24
Series
Trita-MEK, ISSN 0348-467X ; 2011:02
Keywords
tensegrity, boom, finite element analysis, genetic algorithm, flexibility analysis, active structure
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-34039 (URN)
Presentation
2011-05-26, 10:15
Opponent
Supervisors
Note
QC 20110524Available from: 2011-05-24 Created: 2011-05-24 Last updated: 2011-05-24Bibliographically approved
2. Stiffness and vibration properties of slender tensegrity structures
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Stiffness and vibration properties of slender tensegrity structures
2012 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The stiffness and frequency properties of tensegrity structures are functions of the pre-stress, topology, configuration, and axial stiffness of the elements. The tensegrity structures considered are tensegrity booms, tensegrity grids, and tensegrity power lines.

A study has been carried out on the pre-stress design. It includes (i) finding the most flexible directions for different pre-stress levels, (ii) finding the pre-stress pattern which maximizes the first natural frequency.

To find the optimum cross-section areas of the elements for triangular prism and Snelson tensegrity booms, an optimization approach is utilized. A constant mass criterion is considered and the genetic algorithm (GA) is used as the optimization method.

The stiffness of the triangular prism and Snelson tensegrity booms are modified by introducing actuators. An optimization approach by means of a GA is employed to find the placement of the actuators and their minimum length variations. The results show that the bending stiffness improves significantly, but still an active tensegrity boom is less stiff than a passive truss boom. The GA shows high accuracy in searching the non-structural space.

The tensegrity concept is employed to design a novel transmission power line .A tensegrity prism module is selected as the building block. A complete parametric study is performed to investigate the influence of several parameters such as number of modules and their dimensions on the stiffness and frequency of the structure. A general approach is suggested to design the structure considering wind and ice loads. The designed structure has more than 50 times reduction of the electromagnetic field and acceptable deflections under several loading combinations.

A study on the first natural frequencies of Snelson, prisms, Micheletti, Marcus and X-frame based tensegrity booms has been carried out. The result shows that the differences in the first natural frequencies of the truss and tensegrity booms are significant and not due to the number of mechanisms or pre-stress levels. The tensegritybooms of the type Snelson with 2 bars and prism with 3 bars have higher frequencies among tensegrity booms.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2012. p. vii, 25
Keywords
Tensegrity booms, Tensegrity grids, Tensegrity power lines, Finite element analysis, Genetic algorithm, Flexibility analysis, Form-finding, Pre-stress design, Optimization
National Category
Applied Mechanics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-101769 (URN)978-91-7501-461-6 (ISBN)
Public defence
2012-09-20, Sal F3, Lindstedtsvägen 26, KTH, Stockholm, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

QC 20120904

Available from: 2012-09-04 Created: 2012-09-03 Last updated: 2012-09-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records BETA

Eriksson, AndersTibert, Gunnar

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dalilsafaei, SeifEriksson, AndersTibert, Gunnar
By organisation
Structural Mechanics
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 234 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf