Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Is attentional blink a byproduct of neocortical attractors?
KTH, School of Computer Science and Communication (CSC), Computational Biology, CB. Karolinska Institute, Sweden.
KTH, School of Computer Science and Communication (CSC), Computational Biology, CB. Karolinska Institute, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2358-7815
2011 (English)In: Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, ISSN 1662-5188, E-ISSN 1662-5188, Vol. 5, article id 13Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study proposes a computational model for attentional blink or "blink of the mind," a phenomenon where a human subject misses perception of a later expected visual pattern as two expected visual patterns are presented less than 500 ms apart. A neocortical patch modeled as an attractor network is stimulated with a sequence of 14 patterns 100 ms apart, two of which are expected targets. Patterns that become active attractors are considered recognized. A neocortical patch is represented as a square matrix of hypercolumns, each containing a set of minicolumns with synaptic connections within and across both minicolumns and hypercolumns. Each minicolumn consists of locally connected layer 2/3 pyramidal cells with interacting basket cells and layer 4 pyramidal cells for input stimulation. All neurons are implemented using the Hodgkin-Huxley multi-compartmental cell formalism and include calcium dynamics, and they interact via saturating and depressing AMPA/NMDA and GABA(A) synapses. Stored patterns are encoded with global connectivity of minicolumns across hypercolumns and active patterns compete as the result of lateral inhibition in the network. Stored patterns were stimulated over time intervals to create attractor interference measurable with synthetic spike traces. This setup corresponds with item presentations in human visual attentional blink studies. Stored target patterns were depolarized while distractor patterns where hyperpolarized to represent expectation of items in working memory. Simulations replicated the basic attentional blink phenomena and showed a reduced blink when targets were more salient. Studies on the inhibitory effect of benzodiazepines on attentional blink in human subjects were compared with neocortical simulations where the GABA(A) receptor conductance and decay time were increased. Simulations showed increases in the attentional blink duration, agreeing with observations in human studies. In addition, sensitivity analysis was performed on key parameters of the model, including Ca2+-gated K+ channel conductance, synaptic depression, GABA(A) channel conductance and the NMDA/AMPA ratio of charge entry.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. Vol. 5, article id 13
Keyword [en]
attentional blink, attention, neocortex, cortical dynamics, Hodgkin-Huxley model, attractor networks
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-33975DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2011.00013ISI: 000290168400001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84959490431OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-33975DiVA, id: diva2:419948
Funder
Swedish e‐Science Research CenterSwedish Foundation for Strategic Research Swedish Research Council, VR-621-2004-3807
Note

QC 20110530

Available from: 2011-05-30 Created: 2011-05-23 Last updated: 2018-03-05Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Investigations of neural attractor dynamics in human visual awareness
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Investigations of neural attractor dynamics in human visual awareness
2018 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

What we see, how we see it and what emotions may arise from stimuli has long been studied by philosophers, psychologists, medical doctors and neuroscientists. This thesis work investigates a particular view on the possible dynamics, utilizing computational models of spiking neural attractor networks. From neurological studies on humans and other primates, we know visual perception and recognition of objects occur partly along the visual ventral stream, from V1 to V2, V4, IT and downstream to other areas. This visual awareness can be both conscious and unconscious and may also trigger an emotional response. As seen from many psychophysical experiments in backward masking (BM) and attentional blink (AB), some spatial and temporal dynamics can determine what becomes visually conscious and what does not. To explore this computationally, biophysical models of BM and AB were implemented and simulated to mimic human experiments, with the assumption that neural assemblies as attractor networks activate and propagate along the ventral stream and beyond. It was observed that attractor interference between percepts in sensory and associative cortex can occur during this activity. During typical human AB experimental trials in which two expected target symbols amongst distractors are presented less than 500 ms apart, the second target is often not reported as seen. When simulating this paradigm as two expected target neural attractors amongst distractors, it was observed in the present work that an initial attractor in associative cortex can impede the activation and propagation of a following attractor, which mimics missing conscious perception of the second target. It was also observed that simulating the presence of benzodiazepines (GABA agonists) will slow cortical dynamics and increase the AB, as previously shown in human experiments.

During typical human BM experimental trials in which a brief target stimulus is followed by a masking stimulus after a short interval of less than 100 ms, recognition of the target can be impaired when in close spatial proximity. When simulating this paradigm using a biophysical model of V1 and V2 with feedforward and feedback connections, attractor targets were activated in V1 before imposition of a proximal metacontrast mask. If an activating target attractor in V1 is quiesced enough with lateral inhibition from a mask, or not reinforced by recurrent feedback from feedforward activation in V2, it is more likely to burn out before becoming fully active and progressing through V2 and beyond. BM was also simulated with an increasing stimulus interval and with the presence and absence of feedback activity. This showed that recurrent feedback diminishes BM effects and can make conscious perception more likely.

To better understand possible emotional components of visual perception and early regulation, visual signaling pathways to the amygdala were investigated and proposed for emotional salience and the possible onset of fear. While one subcortical and likely unconscious pathway (before amydala efferent signaling) was affirmed via the superior colliculus and pulvinar, four others traversed through the ventral stream. One traversed though IT on recognition, another via the OFC on conditioning, and two other possibly conscious pathways traversed though the parietal and then prefrontal cortex, one excitatory pathway via the ventral-medial area and one regulatory pathway via the ventral-lateral area. Predicted latencies were determined for these signaling pathways, which can be experimentally testable. The conscious feeling of fear itself may not occur until after interoceptive inspection.

A pathology of attractor dynamics was also investigated, which can occur from the presence of a brain tumor in white matter. Due to degradation from tumor invasion of white matter projections between two simulated neocortical patches, information transfer between separate neural attractors degraded, leading first to recall errors and later to epileptic-like activity. Neural plasticity could partially compensate up to a point, before transmission failure. This suggests that once epileptic seizures start in glioma patients, compensatory plasticity may already be exhausted. Interestingly, the presence of additional noise could also partially compensate for white matter loss.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm, Sweden: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2018
Series
TRITA-EECS-AVL ; 2018:18
Keyword
attractor dynamics, visual awareness, visual perception, visual attention, attentional blink, backward masking, gliomas, brain tumor, white matter, cell assemblies, neocortical model, threat response, fear signaling, amygdala
National Category
Other Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering Neurosciences
Research subject
Biological Physics; Computer Science; Applied and Computational Mathematics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-223744 (URN)978-91-7729-706-2 (ISBN)
Public defence
2018-03-26, air/fire at SciLifeLab, Tomtebodavägen 23a, Solna, 13:30 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research , A3 05:190Swedish e‐Science Research Center
Note

QC 20180305

Available from: 2018-03-05 Created: 2018-03-05 Last updated: 2018-03-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Silverstein, David N.Lansner, Anders
By organisation
Computational Biology, CB
In the same journal
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 188 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf