Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Analysis of aortic wall stress and rupture risk in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm with a gender perspective
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Solid Mechanics (Dept.).
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Solid Mechanics (Dept.).
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: Journal of Vascular Investigation, ISSN 0741-5214, Vol. 54, no 2, 295-299 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: The most commonly used predictor of rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is the diameter; however, this does not estimate the true risk for each patient. Why women with AAAs have an increased growth rate, weaker aortic wall, and increased risk for rupture is yet unclear. It is likely that geometrical and biomechanical properties contribute to found gender differences. Several studies have shown that peak wall stress (PWS) and peak wall rupture risk (PWRR), predicted by a finite element (FE) analysis of AAAs derived from computed tomography (CT), is a better predictor of rupture than maximum diameter. The purpose of this study was to investigate if women with AAAs have an increased PWS and PWRR using an FE model compared to men. Method: Fifteen men and 15 women (AAAs 4-6 cm) were included. AAA geometry was derived from CT scans, and PWS and PWRR were estimated using the FE method. Comparisons were made by t test and Mann-Whitney test. Results: Mean age (women 73 years old vs men 71 years old) and mean AAA diameter was similar (49.7 mm vs 50.1 mm) for women and men. PWS did not differ for women 184 and men 198 kPa. PWRR was 0.54 (0.28-0.85) for women and 0.43 (0.24-0.66) for men, P = .06. Conclusion: This is the first analysis of stress and strength of the aneurysm wall with a gender perspective. The reported higher rupture risk for women has previously not been tested with geometrical and biomechanical properties. PWS did not differ, but the PWRR was slightly higher in women. However, the difference did not reach statistical significance, probably due to the small sample size. In summary, the results in the present study suggest that differences in biomechanical properties could be a contributing explanation for the higher rupture risk reported for female patients with AAAs. (J Vase Surg 2011;54:295-9.)

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. Vol. 54, no 2, 295-299 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-38994DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.12.053ISI: 000293814400003ScopusID: 2-s2.0-79961168907OAI: diva2:438840
Available from: 2011-09-05 Created: 2011-09-05 Last updated: 2011-09-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gasser, T. Christian
By organisation
Solid Mechanics (Dept.)
In the same journal
Journal of Vascular Investigation
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 24 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link