Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Affective engineering evaluation of non-linear trigger switch mechanisms
KTH, School of Technology and Health (STH), Ergonomics.
KTH, School of Technology and Health (STH), Ergonomics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5338-0586
2011 (English)In: Applied Ergonomics, ISSN 0003-6870, E-ISSN 1872-9126Article in journal (Other academic) Submitted
Abstract [en]

The trigger switch mechanisms of nutrunners are important for operators to perceive feedback while tightening bolt joints. Previous studies focus on associations between discomfort evaluations and powered tool operation. This paper addresses how operator preferences are linked with functionality requirements from trigger switch mechanisms. Subjects evaluated five switch mechanism prototypes regarding perceptions of quality, feedback, firmness, and distinctness. Results suggest that loading and unloading phases of trigger operation are significant predictors of perceptions of quality. The trigger switch mechanism with a combination of high peak-drop-bottom forces was perceived with better quality, feedback, and distinctness in comparison to the other mechanisms. The study also revealed that when the switch mechanism was designed to give more distinctness and feedback, higher quality is perceived.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Keyword [en]
Ergonomics; rough set; product design.
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-43454OAI: diva2:448471
QS 20120316Available from: 2011-10-17 Created: 2011-10-17 Last updated: 2012-03-16Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Engineering Quality Feelings: Applications in products, service environments and work systems
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Engineering Quality Feelings: Applications in products, service environments and work systems
2011 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Contemporary quality issues in product design are moving from materialistic to emotional user fulfillment; comprehensive research is needed to examine quality product feelings. This research is directed toward a deeper understanding of user and customer quality feelings for different product types, including services.

The quality feelings concept includes dimensions of product quality, especially functionality, ergonomics and aesthetics. The first objective of this thesis is to identify, prioritize and synthesize quality feelings into product attributes in product development applications. The second objective is to explore, test and propose methodological approaches for designing quality feelings into products.

Several methods from psychology, ergonomics, statistics and probabilistic methods and heuristics were applied to achieve the objectives. From a methodological viewpoint, Likert scales, free elicitation technique and Just About Right scales were applied for data collection. Multiple Regression, Factor Analysis, Correspondence Analysis, Genetic algorithms, Partial Least Squares (PLS) and Rough Sets (RS) were applied for data analyses. For ergonomic product evaluations, direct observations, 3D workload simulations, time and frequency analyses were conducted.

Five product applications are included in this thesis: operator driver cabin design of reach trucks, steering wheel design trigger switch design in right-angled nutrunners, bed-making systemsproducts and waiting room environments.

Heuristic methods were found effective when there is a high number of product attributes that interact to provide quality feelings. RS results are consistent with PLS attribute predictions. When the number of product attributes is large in comparison to the number of observations, PLS extracts informative results for quality feelings. The RS method is effective in identifying interactions among design attributes.

Quality feelings are associated with both tangible (tactile characteristics) and intangible (quick and easy to use) product characteristics. Words such as safety, functionality, ergonomics, comfort, reliability, supportiveness, usability, feedback, pleasantness, attractiveness, durability and distinctiveness describe quality feelings from tangible products and services. Based on product type, the quality dimensions represented by these words possess different interactions and dependencies. In work environments, products act as prostheses between workers for social interaction, which need to be considered as important quality feelings dimensions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2011. xiv, 155 p.
Trita-STH : report, ISSN 1653-3836 ; 11:5
ew product development, ergonomics evaluation design for quality, Affective Engineering, servicescape design, product experience
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-43388 (URN)
Public defence
2011-10-31, 3-221, Alfred Nobel`s Alle 10, Huddinge, 13:19 (English)
QC 20111017Available from: 2011-10-17 Created: 2011-10-14 Last updated: 2011-10-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ayas, EbruEklund, Jörgen
By organisation
In the same journal
Applied Ergonomics
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 211 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link