Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Environmental accounting dimensions: Pros and cons of trajectory convergence and increased efficiency
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.).
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.).
2005 (English)In: Implementing Environmental Management Accounting: Status and Challenges / [ed] Rikhardsson, PM; Bennett, M; Bouma, JJ; Schaltegger, S, 2005, Vol. 18, 63-80 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Three dimensions of physically based environmental accounting are indicated-regional, company and product accounting-these have developed along different paths. In the globalised and highly specialised economy of today, company activities and their services are multinational and are to a decreasing degree to be seen as a subset of regions. Consequently, these accounting practices intersect each other, on three dimensions, from micro to macro levels. Even though they are all based on physical and energy input/output (I/O) analysis the differences in terminology, structure and evaluation methods make it difficult to exchange data and use them efficiently. This paper explores several aspects of these three environmental accounting dimensions such as the control engineering tradition, the lack of adequate data and the resource consuming work as well as incompatibility, overlapping scopes and aims. The conclusion is that the three accounting dimensions are similar in construction in spite of a development in independent paths. The differences are not primarily the three-letter acronyms of the tools but the objectives and control scope used in studies. If adopting a common framework and a global all-dimensional nomenclature there are great potentials for increasing the work efficiency, making the tools towards sustainability more sustainable.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005. Vol. 18, 63-80 p.
Series
ECO-EFFICIENCY IN INDUSTRY AND SCIENCE, 18
National Category
Economics and Business Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-43260ISI: 000232403000004ISBN: 1-4020-3371-0 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-43260DiVA: diva2:448744
Conference
6th Annual Conference of the Environmental-Management-Accounting-Network (EMAN) Location: Aarhus Sch Business, Aarhus, DENMARK Date: JAN 23-24, 2003
Note
QC 20111018Available from: 2011-10-18 Created: 2011-10-14 Last updated: 2011-10-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Cerin, PontusLaestadius, Staffan
By organisation
Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.)
Economics and BusinessEnvironmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 157 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf