Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Conceptualizing the Territorial in Cohesion Policy Instruments
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Urban Planning and Environment, Urban and Regional Studies.
(English)Article in journal (Other academic) Submitted
Abstract [en]

This paper explores the multiple conceptualizations of territorial cohesion on various levels, and specifically in connection with Cohesion Policy instruments. It examines a number of European-wide “storylines” of territorial cohesion, creating a type of “meta-storyline” to show the diversity of ways that the concept is seen in Europe. Secondly, the paper examines how territorial cohesion is explicitly and implicitly conceptualized Cohesion Policy instruments and asks if there are different logics of territorial cohesion at various spatial scales? If so, when in the discourse and storylines does one logic seem to take precedence over the other and why?

National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-45047OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-45047DiVA: diva2:451634
Note
QS 20120328Available from: 2011-10-26 Created: 2011-10-26 Last updated: 2012-03-28Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Institutional Capacity for Territorial Cohesion
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Institutional Capacity for Territorial Cohesion
2011 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Territorial cohesion has its legal basis in the Treaty of Lisbon and is one of the overarching goals in the 2007-2013 Cohesion Policy instruments. Still the definition of territorial cohesion can be characterized as a ‘moving target’ - each EU Member State and region conceptualizes the policy goal in as befits the specific regional challenges and opportunities of the territory. The thesis examines the concept of territorial cohesion as a normative goal that is intended to be implemented at various territorial governance levels. The point of departure of the thesis is that it is important for institutions, as formal and informal ‘rules of the game’, to have the capacity or potential mobilization resources to plan for and achieve territorial cohesion and regional development. Institutional capacity is operationalized by use of a general framework consisting of knowledge resources, relational resources and mobilization capacity. The thesis is built on six papers that each deal with an issue (EU enlargement, climate change adaptation and mitigation, innovative capacity and cores and peripheries) that has territorial impact at three levels - the international or EU level, the transnational or macro-regional level and the local/regional level. The papers use primarily qualitative methods and each paints a very different picture of the potential role of institutions in understanding territorial cohesion.

A cover essay links the articles analytically, building the question of how territorial cohesion is conceptualized on multiple levels through different theoretical and policy ‘lenses’. Synthesized results of the papers confirm that there are two quite different logics of action informing the way territorial cohesion is used as a goal or a means at the three levels. Applying the institutional capacity framework to cases working towards territorial cohesion at different levels has concluded that knowledge-building resources are most important for EU-level institutions, relational resources are most important at the transnational or macro-regional level, and mobilization capacity is key for local/regional institutions in efforts towards place-based development. The thesis has shown that there is added value in using the same framework of analysis at very different territorial levels. Scaling up or scaling down analytical levels appears to provide some added substance to a coherent picture of territorial cohesion even if there is a risk that it increases complexity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2011. 82 p.
Series
Trita-SOM , ISSN 1653-6126 ; 2011:14
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-45063 (URN)978-91-7501-111-0 (ISBN)
Public defence
2011-11-03, F3, Lindstedtsvägen 26 Entreplan, KTH, Stockholm, 09:30 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note
QC 20111026Available from: 2011-10-26 Created: 2011-10-26 Last updated: 2011-10-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
van Well, Lisa
By organisation
Urban and Regional Studies
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 90 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf