Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Posterior error probabilities and false discovery rates: two sides of the same coin
(Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5689-9797
2008 (English)In: Journal of Proteome Research, ISSN 1535-3893, E-ISSN 1535-3907, Vol. 7, no 1, 40-44 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A variety of methods have been described in the literature for assigning statistical significance to peptides identified via tandem mass spectrometry. Here, we explain how two types of scores, the q-value and the posterior error probability, are related and complementary to one another.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 7, no 1, 40-44 p.
National Category
Bioinformatics (Computational Biology)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-48856DOI: 10.1021/pr700739dISI: 000252154200004PubMedID: 18052118OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-48856DiVA: diva2:458744
Note
QC 20111124Available from: 2011-11-23 Created: 2011-11-23 Last updated: 2017-12-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Käll, Lukas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Käll, Lukas
In the same journal
Journal of Proteome Research
Bioinformatics (Computational Biology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 44 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf