Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Optimization of Weld Nut Geometry by Simulation
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Production Engineering.
2010 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

This project covers resistance projectionwelding of HP weld nuts and simulationsof these weld nuts welded to Dogal(350YP, 600DP, 800DP) and HyTens1000. When the simulation results werecompared to results in the previous report,Resistance Nut Welding of High StrengthSteel, it showed that the simulations ofHPM8 weld nuts were more accurate thenthe HPM6 simulations.Comparison HPM8 weld nut welded againstDogal 600DPTherefore projection geometry of theHPM8 weld nuts was selected foroptimisation in this project. Most of thesimulation results were insufficient but insome of the evaluated cases a satisfactoryweld zone was developed.These geometries were manufactured byturning (modifying) existing weld nuts andthen welded with an MFDC weldingmachine. Cross-sections of these weld nutswere compared to the simulation results.These results showed differences in thefusion zone between simulated results andwelding results. The differences were moreconnected to which base material that wasindicates problems in the material modelsComparisons optimized weld nuts of HPM8 typewelded against Dogal 600DP and HyTens 1000Mechanical testing in terms of pull-out andtorsion tests were also carried out. Themaximum pull-out loads were notsignificantly changed compared to theoriginal design. The torsion test methodthat was used was insufficient. The HPweld nuts joint were too strong to be testedwith manual tools and must be tested withmachine testing as a report done by RezaKhezri suggests.The simulation programme that wasevaluated, SORPAS version 9.0 and 9.8,showed to be an insufficient tool forevaluating and optimisation of nutwelding.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. , 88 p.
Series
Degree Project in Production Engineering, Second Level, 410
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-49776OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-49776DiVA: diva2:460284
Educational program
Master of Science in Engineering - Materials Design and Engineering
Uppsok
Technology
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2011-11-29 Created: 2011-11-29 Last updated: 2011-11-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(37180 kB)1736 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 37180 kBChecksum SHA-512
51d0aa181080967e3b8719d92f00ce0b303c4f8374a1812cc37fe68e19218aa0d37a94fc27b51e9c415aea28b46bb6102538f4705a08d619fa988b4754d47369
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Production Engineering
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1736 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 319 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf