Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
A Bayesian framework for model calibration, comparison and analysis: Application to four models for the biogeochemistry of a Norway spruce forest
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Land and Water Resources Engineering.
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, ISSN 0168-1923, E-ISSN 1873-2240, Vol. 151, no 12, 1609-1621 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Four different parameter-rich process-based models of forest biogeochemistry were analysed in a Bayesian framework consisting of three operations: (1) Model calibration, (2) Model comparison, (3) Analysis of model-data mismatch. Data were available for four output variables common to the models: soil water content and emissions of N(2)O, NO and CO(2). All datasets consisted of time series of daily measurements. Monthly averages and quantiles of the annual frequency distributions of daily emission rates were calculated for comparison with equivalent model outputs. This use of the data at model-appropriate temporal scale, together with the choice of heavy-tailed likelihood functions that accounted for data uncertainty through random and systematic errors, helped prevent asymptotic collapse of the parameter distributions in the calibration. Model behaviour and how it was affected by calibration was analysed by quantifying the normalised RMSE and r(2) for the different output variables, and by decomposition of the MSE into contributions from bias, phase shift and variance error. The simplest model, BASFOR, seemed to underestimate the temporal variance of nitrogenous emissions even after calibration. The model of intermediate complexity. DAYCENT, simulated the time series well but with large phase shift. COUP and MoBiLE-DNDC were able to remove most bias through calibration. The Bayesian framework was shown to be effective in improving the parameterisation of the models, quantifying the uncertainties in parameters and outputs, and evaluating the different models. The analysis showed that there remain patterns in the data - in particular infrequent events of very high nitrogenous emission rate - that are unexplained by any of the selected forest models and that this is unlikely to be due to incorrect model parameterisation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. Vol. 151, no 12, 1609-1621 p.
Keyword [en]
Carbon cycle, Nitrogen cycle, NO, N(2)O, Uncertainty analysis, Water cycle
National Category
Agricultural Science, Forestry and Fisheries
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-53389DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.06.017ISI: 000297277200012ScopusID: 2-s2.0-80054901643OAI: diva2:470322
QC 20111228Available from: 2011-12-28 Created: 2011-12-28 Last updated: 2011-12-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Farahbakhshazad, NedaJansson, Per-Erik
By organisation
Land and Water Resources Engineering
In the same journal
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Agricultural Science, Forestry and Fisheries

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 42 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link