Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Industrialized House Building In Sweden: A Stress Test Approach For Understanding success And Failure
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Real Estate and Construction Management, Building and Real Estate Economics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4841-5056
2011 (English)In: Proceedings from the 6th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organisation, 2011Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Industrialized building of residential houses - which here means off-site production of large elements - has been a controversial area at least since the Second World War. During the last 50 years industrialized house building in Sweden has had two faces. The first is a series of failed large scale projects that tried to introduce a more industrialized approach to the building of multi-family houses. The last two of these failures were NCC-Komplett and Open House. The second face consists of a number of manufacturers of single family houses that for more than 50 years continuously has produced what in Sweden is called “catalogue houses”.

The theoretical framework used in the article is based on the combination of standard economic theory and transaction cost theory presented in the book “Economics, organization and management “by Paul Milgrom and John Roberts (1992).

Based on case studies the aim of the paper is to explain these successes and failures using a "stress test" approach focusing on how the different systems can handle stresses in the form of changes in the business cycle, changes in tastes, technological problems and problems with suppliers.

The conclusion was that that the new systems for industrialized housing were not designed in such a way that it could handle different types of stress. The successful producer of catalogue houses::

- Spread risk among a larger number of involved actors – e.g. salespersons and local contractors that assembled the product. In this way they also created stronger incentives.

- This company had more direct contact with the market and could both learn from and influence demand to a higher degree.

- This company used established techniques and also more products bought from supplier and subcontractors with which company A had long term relations.

Perhaps the conclusion should also in this area be that revolutions are very difficult. Introducing a radically new way of producing that would in a short period of time change the way houses are produced is then doomed to fail. More interesting developments are then to experiment with smaller steps, where e.g. somewhat larger components are bought from subcontractors.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011.
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-58683OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-58683DiVA: diva2:473800
Conference
6th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organisation, April 13, 2011 – April 15, 2011, Copenhagen, Denmark
Note
QC 20120112Available from: 2012-01-07 Created: 2012-01-07 Last updated: 2012-01-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Lind, Hans

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lind, Hans
By organisation
Building and Real Estate Economics
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 203 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf