Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Variability of strength and deformation properties in lime-cement columns evaluated from CPT and KPS measurements
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Soil and Rock Mechanics.
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Soil and Rock Mechanics.
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Soil and Rock Mechanics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9615-4861
2013 (English)In: Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, ISSN 1749-9518, E-ISSN 1749-9526, Vol. 7, no 1, 21-36 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The strength variability of soil improved by deep mixing with lime-cement columns is generally high. Eurocode 7 states that selection of characteristic values for geotechnical parameters shall take the variability of measured property values into account. This variability can be considered in the design by using reliability-based design. With reliability-based design, three statistical parameters are needed to evaluate the design value; mean, variance and scale of fluctuation. In this paper, the shear strength of soil improved by lime-cement columns was evaluated using two different penetration methods, the cone penetration test and the column penetration test. The strength was quantified statistically by the mean, variance and scale of fluctuation, while each test method was analyzed and discussed with a focus on its influence on the design value. Based on the analyses, the column penetration test is suggested as a test method for soil improved by lime-cement columns.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 7, no 1, 21-36 p.
Keyword [en]
ground improvement, deep mixing, lime-cement columns, CPT, column penetration test
National Category
Civil Engineering Geotechnical Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-59088DOI: 10.1080/17499518.2013.763571Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84874191684OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-59088DiVA: diva2:475014
Note

QC 20140618. Tidigare titel: "Strength variability in lime-cement columns evaluated using CPT and KPS"

Available from: 2012-01-10 Created: 2012-01-10 Last updated: 2017-12-08Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Characterization of strenght vaiability for reliability-based design of lime-cement columns
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Characterization of strenght vaiability for reliability-based design of lime-cement columns
2012 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2012. xii, 29 p.
Series
TRITA-JOB. LIC, ISSN 1650-951X ; 2017
Keyword
geotechnical engineering, deep mixing, strength variability
National Category
Civil Engineering Geotechnical Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-98816 (URN)
Presentation
2012-06-05, B1, KTH, Brinellvägen 23, Stockholm, 13:00
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

QC 20120703

Available from: 2012-07-03 Created: 2012-07-03 Last updated: 2014-06-18Bibliographically approved
2. Strength variability in lime-cement columns and its effect on the reliability of embankments
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Strength variability in lime-cement columns and its effect on the reliability of embankments
2011 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Ground improvement by deep mixing (DM) is a generic term used for a number of methods in which a binding agent, often lime and/or cement, is mechanically mixed with the soil to increase its engineering properties. The inherent variability with respect to the engineering properties of the improved soil is high due to the variations in geology and the complex mixing process. High variability introduces uncertainty in estimating improved soil properties and the performance of the structure.

Current design methodology deals with soil properties deterministically and the uncertainties involved are incorporated in a single value represented by a total factor of safety (FS). The chosen FS is highly dependent on the engineer’s judgment and past experience, in which both of these factors vary between different geotechnical designers. Therefore, current design methodology used in practice for DM does not deal with uncertainties in a rational way. In order to design a geotechnical system with the desired level of confidence, the uncertainties involved must be integrated in the DM design. This can be achieved by using reliability-based design (RBD) methods.

The research work in this thesis is presented as a collection of three papers. In the first paper, a comprehensive statistical analysis of cone penetration test (CPT) data is described. The objective was to make a contribution to empirical knowledge by evaluating the strength variability of lime-cement columns within the group of tested columns. In the second paper, the effect of the spatial variability and statistical uncertainty with regard to the embankment’s reliability was investigated within the framework of RBD. The study in the third paper investigated the strength variability in lime-cement columns based on two test methods, namely CPT and column penetration test (KPS). In this study, the effect of different test methods on the evaluation of the design value was addressed.

The main conclusions from this study can be summarized as follows. First, the probability distribution function (PDF) for the undrained shear strength of lime-cement columns can be modeled in RBD as normal or log-normal distributions. However, the use of log-normal distribution is recommended for RBD analyses. Second, the evaluated scales of fluctuation indicate ranges of 2 to 4 m and 0.2 to 0.8 m in the horizontal and the vertical directions respectively. This means that in order to fulfill the requirements of independent/uncorrelated samples for assessment of the design value, the spacing between samples must exceed the horizontal scale of fluctuation. It is therefore proposed that the spacing between individual samples should be at least 4 meters. Third, the design values evaluated using CPT and KPS were approximately the same. However, the inherent variability evaluated differs due to the larger volume tested with the KPS probe than with the CPT probe. However, this difference was not significant between the two tests. Fourthly, due to the limitation in the deterministic design in terms of dealing with uncertainties, it is recommended that RBD design should be used in parallel with the deterministic design of lime-cement column.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2011. v, 35 p.
Series
TRITA-JOB. LIC, ISSN 1650-951X ; 2016
Keyword
lime-cement, embankments
National Category
Civil Engineering Geotechnical Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-57992 (URN)
Presentation
2012-02-06, Q2, Osquldasväg 10 NB, KTH, Stockholm, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

QC 20120110

Available from: 2012-01-10 Created: 2012-01-04 Last updated: 2014-06-18Bibliographically approved
3. Aspects of probabalistic serviceability limit state design of dry deep mixing
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Aspects of probabalistic serviceability limit state design of dry deep mixing
2015 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

An expanding population and increased need for infrastructure increasingly necessitate construction on surfaces with poor soil conditions. To facilitate the construction of buildings, roads and railroads in areas with poor soil conditions, these areas are often improved by means of foundation engineering. Constructions that are fairly limited in scope are often founded on shallow or deep foundations. However, these methods are relatively expensive and thus not applicable for large-scale constructions like roads and railroads. A cost-effective way to deal with poor soil conditions is to use ground improvement. This thesis deals with a ground improvement method called deep mixing (DD)using lime-cement columns.

Lime-cement columns are manufactured by pushing a mechanical mixing tool to the desired depth, with the tool then rotated and retracted while a lime-cement binder is distributed into soil, forming lime-cement columns. Because of the complex mixing process and inherent soil variability, soil improved by DD shows high variability with respect to strength and deformation properties. Due to this high variability, it is difficult to predict the properties in advance; it is therefore important to verify the properties after installation. In Sweden, this is normally done using the column penetration test (KKK) method.

Current design praxis considers evaluated mean values in the design, and the effect of variability and uncertainties is dealt with by using a sufficiently high total factor of safety. A more rational approach for dealing with the effect of variability and uncertainties on the reliability of a mechanical system is to include them as parameters in the design model. This can be done by using reliability-based design (RRR). A major incentive for using 𝑅𝑅𝑅 is that lower variability in design properties produces higher design values. This is important since it encourages contractors to improve their manufacturing methodologies because 𝑅𝑅𝑅 allows more homogenous columns to be assigned higher design values. Reliability-based design is also in line with Eurocode 7, which states that the selection of the characteristic values for geotechnical parameters shall take the variability of the measured property values into account.

The first part of this doctoral thesis deals with test methods and quantification of the strength variability of soil improved by lime-cement columns. Tip resistances from three different test sites using three different penetration test methods – the cone penetration test, the column penetration test and the total-sounding test – are analysed and quantified in terms of means, variances and scale of fluctuations. The second part introduces RRR in serviceability limit state (SSS) design, using First Order Reliability Methods (FFFF) and Monte-Carlo simulations.

Summarizing the most important findings and conclusions from this study:

  •  The scale of fluctuation was estimated to be 0.2-0.7 m and 0-3 m in the vertical and horizontal direction, respectively.
  •  The relation between cone tip resistances measured using the cone penetration test and column penetration test does not correspond to the cone factors proposed in previous studies and in the Swedish Design Guidelines.
  •  The agreement between the column penetration test and total-sounding test was found to be “good enough”. It is therefore suggested that the total-sounding test be used as a complement to the column penetration test in evaluating the average strength properties of a group of medium- and high-strength lime-cement columns.
  • Reliability-based design is a rational approach to incorporate strength and deformation parameter variability with an SSS design.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2015. xii, 48 p.
Series
TRITA-JOB PHD, ISSN 1650-9501 ; 1019
National Category
Geotechnical Engineering
Research subject
Civil and Architectural Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-168596 (URN)
Public defence
2015-06-10, Sal B1, Brinellvägen 23, KTH, Stockholm, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

QC 20150605

Available from: 2015-06-05 Created: 2015-06-05 Last updated: 2016-07-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Larsson, Stefan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bergman, NiclasAl-Naqshabandy, Mohammed SalimLarsson, Stefan
By organisation
Soil and Rock Mechanics
In the same journal
Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards
Civil EngineeringGeotechnical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 222 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf