Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Boundary action in construction projects: new collaborative project practices
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Real Estate and Construction Management, Project Communication.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5744-9445
Akademiska Hus, KTH, Sweden.
2012 (English)In: International Journal of Managing Projects in Business/Emerald, ISSN 1753-8378, E-ISSN 1753-8386, Vol. 5, no 3, 364-376 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose – Traditional construction project practice has been based on rigid and impermeable boundaries that have made communication, cooperation and integration a major challenge. However, new collaborative approaches have been developed. This paper aims at adding to knowledge on projects‐as‐practice by interpreting findings from a case study on a contemporary collaborative construction project. The purpose of this paper is to provide knowledge about organizational development in the project‐based construction industry by identifying boundary actions in contemporary collaborative construction practices.Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on an exploratory longitudinal case study approach covering both early design phase and the following production phase, including interviews, participant observation at formal meetings and informal gatherings and internal and external documents. Thus, the methodology used is triangulation and the analysis has followed an interpretative process.Findings – The paper provides empirical insights into three examples of boundary actions of a collaborative construction project: stakeholder boundary action, professional boundary action and geographical boundary action. From a project‐as‐practice perspective, these boundary actions turn out to be interesting renewal initiatives, providing increased understanding of where and how renewal can take place.Research limitations/implications – The findings are based on a single case study and more research on this area is needed. However, the paper shows examples of boundary actions in a contemporary project and thus adds to the knowledge on contemporary projects‐as‐practice.Practical implications – The paper provides implications for construction project managers on examples of renewal arenas.Originality/value – The paper is exploratory and the findings are important for much needed development and renewal of the construction industry.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 5, no 3, 364-376 p.
Keyword [en]
Sweden, Construction industry, Project management, Boundary action, Collaborative project, practices, Construction projects, Communication, Co‐operation
National Category
Construction Management
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-60120DOI: 10.1108/17538371211235272ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84954398892OAI: diva2:477298

QC 20150623

Available from: 2012-01-13 Created: 2012-01-13 Last updated: 2015-06-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Karrbom Gustavsson, TinaGohary, Hayar
By organisation
Project Communication
In the same journal
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business/Emerald
Construction Management

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 192 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link