Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
A model for assessment of proactivity potential in technical resources
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Production Engineering. (EPS)
Chalmers University of Technology, Division of Production Systems.
2010 (English)In: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH CIRP-SPONSORED INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY / [ed] Huang, GQ; Mak, KL; Maropoulos, PG, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2010, 855-864 p.Conference paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The ultimate aim when designing an assembly system is to make it strategically and operationally competitive. Competitive systems for manufacturing, especially assembly systems, have to cope with frequent changes of demands. The aim to have a short response time to customer demand, e.i. mass customization, requires assembly systems that are reliable, have high availability and have ability to produce the right product correctly. This means a combination of short resetting time and ability to vary the systems output of products. A major challenge is to minimize the lead-time that directly has influence on order-to-delivery time, while maintaining product flexibility and robustness to absorb late market changes. Given that the assembly system is working the way it is supposed to do, the order-to-delivery time is directly dependant on the setup time and the operation time. The problem is that automated assembly systems have a low availability due to that technical equipment does not work, caused by lack of knowledge, breakdowns, limited ability to perform the operation etc. This often leeds to that when a company needs variant flexibility they keep the assembly system tasks manual. Totally manual assembly system is not the future for competitiveness. Therefore we need to develop assembly systems that are available and have product flexibility to absorb late market changes, and still have a short order-to delivery time. This paper focuses on the level of automation and is a contribution to future evaluation of how technical solutions either support or work counter to proactivity. The result is a model for evaluation of technical solutions contribution to proactivity. This paper describes a model for assessment of technology and assembly system solutions that fulfil requirements for a proactive assembly system. Criteria for proactivity in different technical solutions of assembly system are reviewed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2010. 855-864 p.
, Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, ISSN 1867-5662 ; 66
Keyword [en]
Proactive Assembly System; Measuring Level of Automation
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Research subject
SRA - Production
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-60148DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-10430-5ISI: 000276236600066ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84903838092ISBN: 978-3-642-10429-9OAI: diva2:477345
6th International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology, Hong Kong, PEOPLES R CHINA, DEC 14-16, 2009
XPRES - Initiative for excellence in production research
QC 20120117Available from: 2012-01-17 Created: 2012-01-13 Last updated: 2012-01-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 216 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopusConference websiteThe final publication is available at

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dencker, Kerstin
By organisation
Production Engineering
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 83 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 85 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link