Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Occupational Exposure Limits in Comparative Perspective: Unity and Diversity Within the European Union
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Philosophy and History of Technology, Philosophy.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3799-4814
2010 (English)In: Regulating Chemical Risks: European and Global Challenges / [ed] Eriksson J., Gilek M., Rudén C., Springer, 2010, 1, 133-150 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This is a book about the regulation of chemical risks; this chapter specifically concerns the regulation of chemicals in the occupational setting. People are exposed to a variety of chemicals during their life; some are to our knowledge not harmful while others are. Working life may be a major contributor to a person’s accumulated chemical exposure. A number of diseases have been related to the occurrence of harmful­ substances in the occupational setting, for instance asthma, allergies and several forms of cancer. One can conclude that the risks associated with chemicals exposure and their regulation in the work place is well worth scientific scrutiny. Occupational exposure limits (OELs) are limits of concentrations of specific substances in the air, averaged over a period of time. The rationale behind OELs is that if the dosage of a chemical is ­sufficiently low, no or acceptably low adverse health effects will arise. The dose–response relationship differs of course with the different inherent traits of the specific chemical. For some chemicals evidence suggests that a negative health effect only occurs above a certain level of exposure, this means that a safe level exposure is possible­ to achieve. For many chemicals this is not the case though, either there is not enough knowledge to derive a no effect level (NOAEL), if such one does indeed exist, or there is in fact a linear dose–response relationship without any threshold. In the ­latter case low-level exposure might only lead to very low individual risks but if many ­persons are exposed the collective exposure result in substantial population effects.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2010, 1. 133-150 p.
Keyword [en]
European Union, OEL, Risk, STEL, TWA
National Category
Environmental Health and Occupational Health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-61278DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9428-5_9Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84892283760ISBN: 978-90-481-9427-8 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-61278DiVA: diva2:478847
Note

QC 20120119

Available from: 2012-01-17 Created: 2012-01-17 Last updated: 2015-05-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Schenk, Linda

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Schenk, Linda
By organisation
Philosophy
Environmental Health and Occupational Health

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 20 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf