Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Performance of principal component analysis and independent component analysis with respect to signal extraction from noisy positron emission tomography data - a study on computer simulated images
KTH, School of Technology and Health (STH), Medical Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1831-9285
Show others and affiliations
2009 (English)In: The Open Neuroimaging Journal, ISSN 1874-4400, Vol. 3, 1-16 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Multivariate image analysis tools are used for analyzing dynamic or multidimensional Positron Emission Tomography, PET data with the aim of noise reduction, dimension reduction and signal separation. Principal Component Analysis is one of the most commonly used multivariate image analysis tools, applied on dynamic PET data. Independent Component Analysis is another multivariate image analysis tool used to extract and separate signals. Because of the presence of high and variable noise levels and correlation in the different PET images which may confound the multivariate analysis, it is essential to explore and investigate different types of pre-normalization (transformation) methods that need to be applied, prior to application of these tools. In this study, we explored the performance of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Independent Component Analysis (ICA) to extract signals and reduce noise, thereby increasing the Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) in a dynamic sequence of PET images, where the features of the noise are different compared with some other medical imaging techniques. Applications on computer simulated PET images were explored and compared. Application of PCA generated relatively similar results, with some minor differences, on the images with different noise characteristics. However, clear differences were seen with respect to the type of pre-normalization. ICA on images normalized using two types of normalization methods also seemed to perform relatively well but did not reach the improvement in SNR as PCA. Furthermore ICA seems to have a tendency under some conditions to shift over information from IC1 to other independent components and to be more sensitive to the level of noise. PCA is a more stable technique than ICA and creates better results both qualitatively and quantitatively in the simulated PET images. PCA can extract the signals from the noise rather well and is not sensitive to type of noise, magnitude and correlation, when the input data are correctly handled by a proper pre-normalization. It is important to note that PCA as inherently a method to separate signal information into different components could still generate PC1 images with improved SNR as compared to mean images.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 3, 1-16 p.
National Category
Medical Engineering
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-65257PubMedID: 19572032ISBN: 1874-4400 (Electronic)OAI: diva2:483246

QC 20120125

Available from: 2012-01-25 Created: 2012-01-25 Last updated: 2014-02-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links


Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hamid Muhammed, Hamed
By organisation
Medical Engineering
In the same journal
The Open Neuroimaging Journal
Medical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 24 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link