Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Quantitative assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm geometry and rupture potential
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Solid Mechanics (Dept.), Biomechanics. (vascuMECH)
2009 (English)In: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME SUMMER BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE - 2009, PT A AND B, 2009, 1303-1304 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Recent biomechanics studies have shown that the maximum transverse diameter of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and its expansion rate are not reliable indicators of rupture potential. We hypothesize that geometrical shape and size, as well as wall thickness may be related to rupture risk and can therefore be deciding factors in the clinical management of the disease. A non-invasive, image-based evaluation of AAA size and geometry was implemented on a retrospective study of twenty subjects. The contrast enhanced, computed tomography (CT) scans of 10 patients who suffered AAA rupture within 1 month of the scan were compared to those of 10 patients who received elective repair. The images were segmented and three-dimensional models were generated. Twenty-eight geometry-based indices were calculated to characterize the size and shape of each AAA and regional variations in wall thickness were estimated. A multivariate analysis of variance was performed for all indices comparing the ruptured and non-ruptured data sets to determine which indices are statistically significant. Receiving Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine the indices' potential as predictors of rupture risk. In addition to maximum diameter, five other geometry-based indices were found to be statistically significant, with the minimum wall thickness being the best discriminator between ruptures and non-ruptured AAAs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. 1303-1304 p.
National Category
Biological Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-72262ISI: 000280089000652Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-77953755606ISBN: 978-079184891-3 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-72262DiVA: diva2:487379
Conference
ASME Summer Bioengineering Conference. Lake Tahoe, CA. JUN 17-21, 2009
Note
QC 20120131Available from: 2012-01-31 Created: 2012-01-31 Last updated: 2012-01-31Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Scopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Martufi, Giampaolo
By organisation
Biomechanics
Biological Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 38 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf