Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An Apprenticeship in Thinking Architecture
(RMIT University, Melbourne Australia)
2005 (English)In: Drawing Together: Convergent Practices in Architectural Education, AASA / [ed] Kathi Holt-Damant, Theodor G. Wyeld, Brisbane: QUT , 2005Conference paper, Published paper (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The relevance and use of theory when approaching the discipline of architecture would appear to have become eclipsed by the excitement associated with emerging digital technologies, and a renewed fascination in nature, appropriated from biological science in the form of genetic algorithmic models. What’s more, if we are to believe Michael Speaks’s Assemblage essay, “Which Way Avant-Garde?” (2000), we are by now obliged to admit the death of theory (a watered down version of philosophy), and contend instead with the fierce world of globalisation, organised by a new brand of intellectual, the entrepreneur or manager.[1] The name, Gilles Deleuze, for instance, cited by Speaks himself, no longer carries its authoritative weight, and folded architecture has become decidedly outmoded. And yet architecture must still find some means of talking about itself, and conceptually enabling its activities. There is, in addition, the mounting institutional pressure for the architectural academic to publish their research. With this paper I will argue that theory constitutes a crucial part of an apprenticeship in the discipline of architecture in both pedagogical and professional contexts. I will return to the work of Deleuze with the claim that the legacy of his particular practice of thought, which we can name, creative philosophy, maintains an influence on the discourse surrounding digital architecture. Through Deleuze’s Spinozist lens I will also speculate on the possibility of imagining an ethics for architecture in what we can call a post-digital age. Here an ethics can also be taken on as an apprenticeship, rather than a predetermined moral code, wherein practice and theory enter into a relationship of ongoing and, at the same time, responsible experimentation in the arena of design.

[1]Michael Speaks, “Which Way Avant-garde?”, Assemblage, no. 41 (April, 2000), p. 78.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Brisbane: QUT , 2005.
Keyword [en]
post-digital architecture, Michael Speaks, Ethico-aesthetics, Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari
National Category
Philosophy, Ethics and Religion Architecture
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-63492OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-63492DiVA: diva2:491065
Conference
Association of Architecture Schools of Australasia
Note

QC 20120920

Available from: 2012-02-06 Created: 2012-01-23 Last updated: 2012-09-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Frichot, Hélène
Philosophy, Ethics and ReligionArchitecture

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 39 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf