Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Do Cost-Benefit Analyses Influence Transport Investment Decisions?: Experiences from the Swedish Transport Investment Plan 2010-21
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Centres, Centre for Transport Studies, CTS.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1789-9238
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Centres, Centre for Transport Studies, CTS.
2012 (English)In: Transport reviews, ISSN 0144-1647, E-ISSN 1464-5327, Vol. 32, no 1, 29-48 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) for transport investments is particularly useful for situations where a large number of investments have to be ranked against each other. This study draws on experiences from the development of the Swedish National Transport Investment Plan 2010-21. We study how CBA results were used in the process of shaping the investment plan and what influence they had on investment decisions. In particular, we compare the planners' rankings versus the politicians' rankings. We find that planners' rankings of investments are influenced by benefit-cost ratios (BCRs), in particular for low and moderate BCRs, while the politicians' rankings are not. By interviewing planners about how CBA was used in the process, we clarify what role CBA actually played in the planning process. We find that not only did the CBAs play a role in investment selection, they also forced investment design to be more cost-efficient. Furthermore, we explore planners' implicit valuations, as revealed by their investment selection, finding that freight benefits were implicitly valued higher and traffic safety lower than the officially recommended CBA weights. Finally, we identify the most important areas for improvement of CBA state-of-practice methodology.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 32, no 1, 29-48 p.
National Category
Transport Systems and Logistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-77193DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2011.582541ISI: 000302564300003Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84857969640OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-77193DiVA: diva2:491417
Funder
TrenOp, Transport Research Environment with Novel Perspectives
Note
QC 20120509Available from: 2012-02-06 Created: 2012-02-06 Last updated: 2017-12-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Eliasson, Jonas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eliasson, JonasLundberg, Mattias
By organisation
Centre for Transport Studies, CTS
In the same journal
Transport reviews
Transport Systems and Logistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 52 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf