Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rating scales in Kansei Engineering-modifications for an European context
KTH, School of Technology and Health (STH), Ergonomics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5338-0586
2010 (English)Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Kansei or Affective Engineering is a relatively new research field in the West. Link ping University in Sweden has been pioneering research and application within Kansei Engineering since 1999. Several companies have cooperated in different Kansei studies, for example Toyota/BT, Volvo, Saab, Scania. In some of the early studies, there were difficulties to apply the methodology. Reasons for this included shortage of competence within affective design in European organizations, but also the fact that incitements for improvement of product design seemed to be lacking. One of the problems applying the methodology was that European participants in the studies did not accept to make a vast number of ratings during long time periods. Japanese researchers used 5-point semantic differential questionnaires and up to 300 rating-scales per participant and product. In order to overcome this problem, a modification of the rating scales was developed. Hence, data reduction methods such as factor analysis, affinity diagram and Pareto charts were tested and validated in order to reduce the number of Kansei words and product samples used, without compromising the validity of the result. This approach eventually resulted in the development of a universal Kansei Engineering Software (KESo) which reduces the time needed for each Kansei Engineering study. Another objective for our research has been to develop and validate methods for incomplete data collection, i.e. a prioritization of product attributes. Another result from the cooperation with industrial companies is that the companies strongly emphasised that product development studies need to be less time and resource consuming.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010.
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-80014OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-80014DiVA: diva2:495926
Conference
International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotional Research, KEER2010. Paris, France. 2nd-4th March 2010
Note
QC 20120424Available from: 2012-02-09 Created: 2012-02-09 Last updated: 2012-04-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Eklund, Jörgen

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eklund, Jörgen
By organisation
Ergonomics
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 323 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf