Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Urban Density: measuring spatial dispersion of activities and affordances
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Urban Planning and Environment, Urban and Regional Studies.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1523-2587
2011 (English)Conference paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

There is a consensus among planners and politicians that dense cities are better for the environment than sprawling urban landscapes. The aim of the project is to analyse how urban density affects people’s actions and choices of residential location.

The study employs theories and concepts from planning research and environmental psychology. Urban density is a key concept. Range and variety of urban functions are then important additions to measurement of physical densities. Another key concept is ‘affordance‘. ’Affordance’ is a quality or asset within a specific environment, which can be perceived and used by an individual for carrying out a certain activity.

The main method is a survey covering a stratified randomised sample of 4500 individuals in stratified within the Stockholm area. The stratified study areas were selected on criteria of physical density, mix of functions and accessibility within the region. The survey covers important ‘affordances’ inherent in the physical environment of the household, such as place of work, shops, schools and social networks. The data are analysed with statistical methods.

The paper concentrates on perceived affordances regarding workplaces. Preliminary results show that respondents’ perceived number of alternative workplaces within 1 kilometre from home has a positive correlation to both physical density and mix of urban functions. Any further away from home than 1 km, increasing perceived affordances had a stronger correlation to accessibility.

Preliminary conclusions are that physical density as such seems to increase the amount of perceived affordances only within a very close environment of the home. The range of affordances widens considerably with increasing accessibility. Probably accessibility outweighs physical density as a factor for influencing people’s choices of residential location.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
National Category
Social Psychology Architectural Engineering
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-81475OAI: diva2:497517
EMHR 2011, Toulouse, 6 - 7 July 2011
QC 20120411Available from: 2012-02-10 Created: 2012-02-10 Last updated: 2012-04-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links


Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Werner, Inga Britt
By organisation
Urban and Regional Studies
Social PsychologyArchitectural Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 93 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link