Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Action explanations are not inherently normative
2008 (English)In: Theoria, ISSN 0040-5817, Vol. 74, no 1, 60-78 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Inherent normativity is the claim that intentional action explanations necessarily have to comply with normatively understood rationality constraints on the ascribed propositional attitudes. This paper argues against inherent normativity in three steps. First, it presents three examples of actions successfully explained with propositional attitudes, where the ascribed attitudes violate relevant rationality constraints. Second, it argues that the inference rules that systematise propositional attitudes are qualitatively different from rationality constraints both in their justification and their recipients. Third, it rejects additional conditions on propositional attitudes, which purport to necessitate a normative commitment. Thus, inherent normativity is rejected; and with it the claim that intentional action explanations differ substantially from other explanations because they are inherently normative.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 74, no 1, 60-78 p.
Keyword [en]
Action explanation; Norms of reasoning; Rationality; Social sciences
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-81977DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-2567.2008.00006.xISI: 000257214300005OAI: diva2:497810
QC 20120213Available from: 2012-02-11 Created: 2012-02-11 Last updated: 2012-02-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Grüne-Yanoff, Till
In the same journal

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 18 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link