Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Estimating soil carbon stock changes by process-based models and soil inventories: uncertainties and complementarities
Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Land and Water Resources Engineering (moved 20130630), Environmental Physics.
Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Gothenburg University.
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: Soil Carbon in Sensitive European Ecosystems: From Science to Land Management / [ed] Robert Jandl, Mirco Rodehiero and Mats Olsson, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

In this chapter, four examples of scientific questions and challenges in which process-oriented modelling could provide a useful contribution for accounting soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks and changes are presented. These challenges include cases i) when measurements are either time-consuming and/or expensive or there are methodological limitations; ii) an attempt to verify the national soil inventory estimates through comparison with process-based model estimates; iii) prediction of the potential impact on SOC changes due to land-use change; and iv) a comparison of different scenarios for mitigating GHG-emissions. We found that the use of process-based models offers a complementary way to account SOC change and provides an option for assessing the potential impact of climate and land-use change on SOC stocks. However, uncertainty in model estimates is inherent and needs to be communicated. Progress has been made in the assessment of uncertainty and there is growing awareness of how this uncertainty can be communicated. Suggestions for collaborative approaches are presented in order to reduce the uncertainties.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-84452DOI: 10.1002/9781119970255.ch10Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84872694254ISBN: 978-1-119-97001-9 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-84452DiVA: diva2:499654
Note

QC 20120411

Available from: 2012-02-13 Created: 2012-02-13 Last updated: 2017-04-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jansson, Per-ErikKarltun, ErikSvensson, Magnus
By organisation
Environmental Physics
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 36 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf