Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
EVAM, A New Revolutionary Ratio?
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Real Estate and Construction Management, Banking and Finance.
2011 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Purpose: To investigate the usefulness of the Economic Value Added Momentum ratio and to determine if Swedish non-real estate, non-financial companies been either positively or negatively affected by their Corporate Real Estate structure from an EVAM perspective. Design/methodology/approach: Using a regression analysis composed of the OMX large and mid cap non-real estate, non-financial companies, investigates the relationship between companies’ real estate holdings and their ability to sustain a positive EVAM. The study covers the time period from 2006 to 2009 and includes 172 observations. Findings: The data showed that a negative relationship between EVAM and PPTY at the 10% real estate intensity interval might exist. However, no evidence was found that might suggest that a negative relationship between EVAM and corporate real estate holdings at the higher (15% real estate intensity) or the lower (5% real estate intensity) existed. This could suggest that companies’ that own lower percentages of real estate assets (less than 5% of PPTY) are not affecting their EVAM value and that companies’ that own larger amount of real estate (15% of PPTY or higher) are better at managing their real estate assets and thus it is not negatively impacting their EVAM. Research Implications: Real estate is reported at historical cost rather than at current fair market values. As the economy has, historically, enjoyed more periods of expansions than contractions, intuitive companies’ real estate assets are undervalued. Economic recession and booms can also dilute both the positive and negative aspects of real estate ownership. Although this investigation seeks to neutralize this phenomenon by including two periods of economic expansion and two periods of economic recession, it is unreasonable to claim that this will completely neutralize this affect. Practical Implications: The companies that have a PPTY of between 10% and 15% might be better off selling their real estate holdings or investing additional funds in real estate so as to either have a PPTY below 10% or above 15%. Companies that are in-between the 10% and 15% real estate ownership segment might not deem it cost effective to have specific real estate professionals or to invest in real estate know-how; however, the firms’ might at the same time own too much real estate, making it too costly to do nothing. Consequently, the companies could be better off deciding on a particular strategy: owning more real estate or owning less real estate. Originality/Value: Investigates if a linkage between a company’s ability to generate a positive EVAM and a company’s quantity of real estate assets exists.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. , 69 p.
Keyword [en]
Real Estate, Sales and Leaseback, Ratio, Direct and Indirect Real Estate Investment, Large and Mid Capitalization, Publically Traded Companies
National Category
Civil Engineering
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-89831OAI: diva2:503704
Subject / course
Educational program
Degree of Master - Real Estate Development and Financial Services
Available from: 2012-02-27 Created: 2012-02-16 Last updated: 2012-02-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(567 kB)593 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 567 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Banking and Finance
Civil Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 593 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 227 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link