Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Inuence of Walking Surfaces and Speeds on Accelerometer-Based Gait Recognition
KTH, School of Information and Communication Technology (ICT).
2012 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Identification and verification first line of defence of every secure system. Due to the advancement of technology and miniaturization, the use of mobile devices is highly increased since last decade. Nowadays, mobile phones are more powerful than the computers of early days of last decade. Today, mobile phones hold a lot of personal and sensitive data, which must be protected using most reliable, robust, convenient and cost effective authentication mechanisms.

Biometric authentication is one of the three methods of identi cation. Gait authentication is one type of biometric authentication that operates on behavioral characteristics of human beings. There are dierent approaches in gait authentication. In this thesis, we have used wearable sensor based approach and for this purpose Google G1 smart phone is used to collect gait data. This thesis is an attempt tond out the inuence of dierent walking speeds (slow, normal and fast) and surfaces (at carpeted, grass, gravel and inclined) on gait recognition. This gait data is collected from 48 subjects for these six dierent walk settings in two sessions on dierent days to measure same day and cross day performance. Later, dierent mathematical and machine learning concepts are used to analyze recorded data and extract typical gait cycle for each subject. Dierent evaluations are conducted to nd out best parameter settings of these methods.

For different walking speeds, same-day results vary between 14% to 29%, and cross day results vary between 29% and 35%. Similarly, for different walking surfaces, same-day results vary between 9.78% to 39%, and cross day results vary between 28% to 42%. Results of tests conducted for one walk setting clearly reects that slight change in parameters also inuences the results.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. , 104 p.
Series
Trita-ICT-EX, 2012:209
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-102364OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-102364DiVA: diva2:552467
Educational program
Master of Science - School of Electrical Engineering (EES) - Master of Science - Research on Information and Communication Technologies
Uppsok
Technology
Examiners
Available from: 2012-09-14 Created: 2012-09-14 Last updated: 2012-09-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2221 kB)830 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2221 kBChecksum SHA-512
7893203164cd74b5aa9eb867a06ea1473f7dc57b222a8383509c8075b59044d2480c77150ce4f79db05f24346ab8a8f22c4fe3ba7e8dac1df7769c61fb27dd2d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Information and Communication Technology (ICT)
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 830 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 471 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf