Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Exploring the (un-)usefulness of formative assessment documents in primary technology
KTH, School of Education and Communication in Engineering Science (ECE), Learning. (Teknikdidaktik)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8889-2562
2014 (English)In: International journal of technology and design education, ISSN 0957-7572, E-ISSN 1573-1804, Vol. 24, no 2, 141-161 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Every student in the Swedish compulsory school system is entitled to information regarding their progress in all school subjects given. In 2008, a mandatory assessment tool, called the individual development plan (IDP) with written assessment, was introduced by the Government. The statutory purpose was to provide teachers with a formative assessment tool to be used mandatory in the follow-up of student’s progress all thru mandatory compulsory school (year 1–9). This study explores the use of the IDP documents in technology education. Authentic documents from different municipalities, different schools and different school years have been studied. In this article findings regarding formal assessment documents and teacher’s formal assessment practice in primary (year 1–6) technology education are presented.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 24, no 2, 141-161 p.
Keyword [en]
primary technology education, assessment document, individual development plan, written assessment, formative assessment
Keyword [sv]
individuella utvecklingsplaner med skriftliga omdömen, iup, skriftliga omdömen, bedömning, formativ bedömning, uppföljning, teknikundervisning
National Category
Social Sciences Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-104441DOI: 10.1007/s10798-013-9250-zISI: 000340487500002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84905638037OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-104441DiVA: diva2:564690
Note

QC 20150623

Available from: 2012-11-02 Created: 2012-11-02 Last updated: 2017-12-07Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. The Inefficient Loneliness: A Descriptive Study about the Complexity of Assessment for Learning in Primary Technology Education
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The Inefficient Loneliness: A Descriptive Study about the Complexity of Assessment for Learning in Primary Technology Education
2012 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis provides findings from a qualitative study that explores the assessment process undertaken by teachers in Swedish primary technology education. The thesis aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of how teachers assess in technology education. In this study assessment with the purpose of acquiring information in order to adjust the teaching to the pupils’ needs for future progress is explored in particular. Teachers’ work with assessment is explored in two teacher-focused sub-studies. Sub-study 1 focuses on the long-cycle formative assessment and on the formal documentation of pupils’ attainment, the so-called IDP with written assessment. Sub-study 2 explores the short cycle of formative assessment and highlights two teachers’ classroom assessments practice. The results presented are built upon authentic samples of assessment documents (IDPs), classroom observations and teacher interviews.

The study shows that the teachers are alone in the planning, executing and follow-up of technology education. Support is both asked for and needed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2012. 100 p.
Series
Trita-ECE 2012:01, 2012:1
Keyword
technology education, assessment, formative assessment, assessment for learning, primary education, teknikundervisning, bedömning, formativ bedömning, bedömning för lärande, individuella utvecklingsplaner med skriftliga omdömen, iup, grundskola, vurdering for laring
National Category
Educational Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-104454 (URN)978-91-7501-552-1 (ISBN)
Presentation
2012-11-28, Sydöstra Galleriet, KTHB, Osquars backe 31, Stockholm, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

QC 20121109

Available from: 2012-11-08 Created: 2012-11-02 Last updated: 2015-03-04Bibliographically approved
2. Assidere Necesse Est: Necessities and complexities regarding teachers’ assessment practices in technology education
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Assidere Necesse Est: Necessities and complexities regarding teachers’ assessment practices in technology education
2015 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis focuses on teachers’ assessment practices in primary and lower secondary schools for technology education (Sv. Teknik). It is grounded in my prior experience as a teacher but also addresses the national and international research fields of technology education and assessment.

The thesis is based on four papers covering different aspects of teachers’ assessment practices in technology. Its aim is to contribute to knowledge regarding how teachers use assessments in primary and lower secondary school. The thesis explores: teachers’ formal documenting practices; primary teachers’ minute-by-minute classroom assessment; teachers’ views on assessment and finally teachers’ statements and motives relating to criteria for success while assessing students’ e-portfolios.

The choice of methods varies, depending on the focus of each sub-study, including quantitative data, collected from official governmental databases, software-generated statistical data and questionnaires as well as qualitative methods such as observations and interviews.

Formal documents proved to be unsupportive for teachers’ assessment practices. Lack of instruction and deficiencies in design templates made these documents practically useless. The classroom study shows that the studied teachers have great ambitions for their pupils to succeed but lack collegial support concerning their assessment practices. Findings also show that teachers who are specifically trained in technology show higher self-efficacy regarding their assessment practices. Based on the results from the teachers' assessments of e-portfolios, it is concluded that there is consensus among the teachers to focus on the whole rather than on particular details in student’s work. The overall results strengthen the importance of designing activities and that students should be taught and not left to unreflective doing in technology.

Teachers’ assessment practices are complex. This thesis shows that teachers work with assessment in different ways. It is also shown that the educational environment is not supportive enough. Assessment is a necessity in the endeavour of bridging teaching and learning in technology, thus affordance for teachers’ assessment practices must be increased. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2015. 89 p.
Series
TRITA-ECE, 2015:2
Keyword
technology education, primary education, assessment, classroom assessment, formative assessment, assessment for learning, self-efficacy, e-portfolio, e-assessment, engineering education, STEM, teknikundervisning, teknikdidaktik, formativ bedömning, bedömning, grundskola, klassrumsbedömning, bedömning för lärande, betyg, vurdering, vurdering for laring
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Research subject
Education and Communication in the Technological Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-160092 (URN)978-91-7595-459-2 (ISBN)
Public defence
2015-03-06, Kollegiesalen, Brinellvägen 8, KTH, Stockholm, 14:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

QC 20150216

Available from: 2015-02-16 Created: 2015-02-13 Last updated: 2015-02-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Hartell, Eva

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hartell, Eva
By organisation
Learning
In the same journal
International journal of technology and design education
Social SciencesEducational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 326 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf