Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparative study of different numerical models of packed bed thermal energy storage systems
GREA UdL.
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Energy Technology, Heat and Power Technology. (Thermal Energy Storage, Energy Technology)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6982-2879
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Energy Technology, Heat and Power Technology. (Thermal Energy Storage, Energy Technology)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9556-552X
GREA UdL.
2013 (English)In: Applied Thermal Engineering, ISSN 1359-4311, E-ISSN 1873-5606, Vol. 50, no 1, 384-392 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper presents, compares and validates two different mathematical models of packed bed storage with PCM, more specifically the heat transfer during charge of the PCM. The first numerical model is a continuous model based on the Brinkman equation and the second numerical model treats the PCM capsules as individual particles (energy equation model). Using the Brinkman model the flow field inside the porous media and the heat transfer mechanisms present in the packed bed systems can be described. On the other hand, using the energy equation model the temperature gradient inside the PCM capsules can be analysed. Both models are validated with experimental data generated by the authors. The experimental set up consists mainly of a cylindrical storage tank with a capacity of 3.73 L full of spherically encapsulated PCM. The PCM used has a storage capacity of 175 kJ/kg between −2–13 °C. The results from the energy equation model show a basic understanding of cold charging. Moreover, three different Nu correlations found in the literature were analysed and compared. All of them showed the same temperature profile of the PCM capsules; hence any of them could be used in future models. The comparison between both mathematical models indicated that free convection is not as important as forced convection in the studied case.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2013. Vol. 50, no 1, 384-392 p.
Keyword [en]
Experimental validation, Numerical simulation, Packed bed, Phase change material, Thermal energy storage
National Category
Energy Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-104904DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.07.020ISI: 000314191100044Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84866525926OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-104904DiVA: diva2:567809
Conference
International Symposium on Innovative Materials for Processes in Energy Systems (IMPRES) - For Fuel Cells, Heat Pumps and Sorption Systems Location: Singapore Date: NOV 29-DEC 01, 2010
Note

QC 20130213

Available from: 2012-11-14 Created: 2012-11-14 Last updated: 2017-12-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Chiu, NingWei JustinMartin, Viktoria

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Chiu, NingWei JustinMartin, Viktoria
By organisation
Heat and Power Technology
In the same journal
Applied Thermal Engineering
Energy Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 81 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf