Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The prequalified competition: how are architects appointed to invited architectural competitions?
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Architecture. (arc•plan)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9715-9656
2012 (English)In: ARCC Journal, ISSN 2329-9339, Vol. 9, no 1, 1-14 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper presents findings from a study of prequalification in architectural competitions. The aim was to develop knowledge of how organizers select architects/teams to invited competitions. Prequalification is a selection procedure used early in the competition process for identifying suitable candidates for the following design phase. Usually three to six architectural firms/teams are invited to develop design solutions for the competition task in Scandinavian. The research question is about how the organizers find these candidates.

 

There are 10 competitions examined in the paper. Five municipal competitions and five organised by government clients. The reason for the selection of cases is that the public sector is a major organizer of competitions in the Nordic countries. The methodology of the investigation is a combination of mapping, case studies and document review. Results show that there are 375 applications from architects in the ten competitions. 43 architect firms/teams (11 %) have been invited to competitions. The vast majority of the applications (84 %) came from Sweden. This is explained by the fact that organizers require Swedish as the competition language.

 

All the organizers used a selection process that included two distinct phases. The clients start by checking whether the applications meet the requirements specified in the invitation. This is followed by an evaluative phase with assessment of the architectural offices professional profile, supported by relevant reference projects and personal references. Decisive in the final assessment is the organizer’s evaluation of the candidates’ ability to produce the project with architectural quality, to combine creative solutions with functional demands and to cooperate with developers and contractors. The assessment in the second evaluative phase is performed with the support of three different models: voting among reviewers, scoring merits in applications or by an overall assessment of candidates.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 9, no 1, 1-14 p.
Keyword [en]
competition, invitation, application, selection, design teams
National Category
Humanities
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-118801DOI: 10.17831/enq:arcc.v9i1.62OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-118801DiVA: diva2:608502
Note

Forskningen har fått stöd av FFNS-stiftelsen och Helgo Zettervalls fond.

QC 20130305

Available from: 2013-03-05 Created: 2013-02-27 Last updated: 2017-06-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

bilaga(226 kB)573 downloads
File information
File name ATTACHMENT01.pdfFile size 226 kBChecksum SHA-512
ace5e3b79b7ec656ecae1cd825874eb38ee947d15dc4c37bb0816e2992458bd3a53260a6c185d2c5399c75fbceeaa36cef2ffa590712a57fb4ddcc852013db67
Type attachmentMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Rönn, Magnus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rönn, Magnus
By organisation
Architecture
Humanities

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 66 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf