Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Plasticity and Bias in Peer Assessment: Critical Perspectives from Bibliometrics
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.), Business Development and Entrepreneurship (Closed 20130101).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1292-8239
2011 (English)In: PROCEEDINGS OF ISSI 2011: THE 13TH CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS, 2011, 742-746 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This research paper in progress discusses some of the common criticisms of peer review: Costs and Robustness, Nepotism (conflict of interest), Sexism and Cognitive Bias. Attention is given to the fact that much of the research reported fails on a crucial point: The use of bibliometrics as a correlate for the grading and ranking done by granting or evaluation committees (ad hoc or standing committees). The full paper will extend the analysis using data from a selection of finished projects and assessments. Results indicate that there are systemic problems regarding peer review: Firstly, the positive bias in university assessments based on ad hoc committees. Problems circulate around the absence of robust benchmarks and the ad hoc selection of experts. Secondly, the role of cognitive distance points to the power mechanisms in selection processes for finding relevant reviewers. Thirdly, the low levels of peer's performance (in bibliometric respect) indicate that selection of peers is no longer to search for the best possible peer, but instead, the pragmatic peer.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. 742-746 p.
Series
Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSN 2175-1935
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-121385ISI: 000305337100077ISBN: 978-90-817527-0-1 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-121385DiVA: diva2:618652
Conference
13th Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics (ISSI), JUL 04-07, 2011, Durban, SOUTH AFRICA
Note

QC 20130429

Available from: 2013-04-29 Created: 2013-04-29 Last updated: 2013-05-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Sandström, Ulf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandström, Ulf
By organisation
Business Development and Entrepreneurship (Closed 20130101)
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 48 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf