Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Pitfall in Assessing the Size of Tumor Phantoms on Mammograms
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Anticancer Research, ISSN 0250-7005, E-ISSN 1791-7530, Vol. 33, no 3, 1131-1134 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Tumor size is crucial for clinical management and prognosis of breast malignancies. Materials and Methods: The gold standard-size of 12 tumor phantoms was assessed at The Department of Production Engineering. Subsequently, with a conventional ruler, seven experienced mammographers measured the largest diameter of the 12 devices in two independent trials. Results: In the first trial, 30% (n=25) of the 84 values given by the seven mammographers failed to recreate the gold standard size by >1 mm and in the second, by 37% (31184). Size was overestimated (>1 mm) in 9.5% (n=8) of 84 measurements in the first trial, and in 15.5% (14184) in the second. Conversely, size was underestimated (>1 mm) in 20% (n=17) of 84 measurements in the first trial, and in 21% (18/84) in the second. Neither the age of the participants, nor their years of experience improved the obtained results. Discussion: The method used here raised doubts concerning the ability of discriminating size among subgroups of T1 breast tumors in mammograms. According to the TNM staging system, T1 tumors (<= 2.0 cm in greatest dimension) are subdivided into T1mic: microinvasion (<= 0.1 cm), T1a (>0.1 cm but not more than 0.5 cm), T1b (>0.5 cm but not more than 1.0 cm) and Tic (>1.0 cm but not more than 2.0 cm in their greatest dimension). Since the TNM staging system for breast tumors is important in therapeutic decision making, it is crucial to develop a more reliable method for tumor size assessment.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 33, no 3, 1131-1134 p.
Keyword [en]
Breast, mammograms, tumor phantoms, tumor size
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-121479ISI: 000316770400051Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84875879706OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-121479DiVA: diva2:619720
Note

QC 20130506

Available from: 2013-05-06 Created: 2013-04-29 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Scopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mattsson, Lars
By organisation
Production Engineering
In the same journal
Anticancer Research
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 29 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf