Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Ecosystem services as technology of globalization: On articulating values in urban nature
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Philosophy and History of Technology, History of Science, Technology and Environment. University of Cape Town. (KTH Environmental Humanities)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6415-4821
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Philosophy and History of Technology, History of Science and Technology (name changed 20120201).
2013 (English)In: Ecological Economics, ISSN 0921-8009, E-ISSN 1873-6106, Vol. 86, 274-284 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The paper demonstrates how ecosystem services can be viewed and studied as a social practice of value articulation. With this follows that when ecosystem services appear as objects of calculated value in decision-making they are already tainted by the social and cannot be viewed as merely reflecting an objective biophysical reality. Using urban case studies of place-based struggles in Stockholm and Cape Town, we demonstrate how values are relationally constructed through social practice. The same analysis is applied on ecosystem services. Of special interest is the TEEB Manual that uses a consultancy report on the economic evaluation of Cape Town's 'natural assets' to describe a step-by-step method to catalog, quantify and price certain aspects of urban nature. The Manual strives to turn the ecosystem services approach into a transportable method, capable of objectively measuring the values of urban nature everywhere, in all cities in the world. With its gesture of being universal and objective, the article suggests that the ecosystem services approach is a technology of globalization that de-historicizes and de-ecologizes debates on urbanized ecologies, effectively silencing other and often marginalized ways of knowing and valuing. The paper inscribes ecosystem services as social practice, as part of historical process, and as inherently political. A call is made for critical ethnographies of how ecosystem services and urban sustainability indicators are put into use to change local decision-making while manufacturing global expertise.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 86, 274-284 p.
Keyword [en]
Urban nature protection, Postpolitical, New Public Management (NPM), Actor-Network Theory (ANT), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB), ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability
National Category
Ecology Economics and Business
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-122533DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.012ISI: 000317803500033ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84874016190OAI: diva2:623109
Swedish Research Council Formas, 250-2010-1372

QC 20150629

Available from: 2013-05-24 Created: 2013-05-23 Last updated: 2015-06-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ernstson, HenrikSörlin, Sverker
By organisation
History of Science, Technology and EnvironmentHistory of Science and Technology (name changed 20120201)
In the same journal
Ecological Economics
EcologyEconomics and Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 70 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link