Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Improving gravimetric-isostatic models of crustal depth by correcting for non-isostatic effects and using CRUST2.0
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Urban Planning and Environment, Geodesy and Geoinformatics.
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Urban Planning and Environment, Geodesy and Geoinformatics. University of Gävle, Sweden .
2013 (English)In: Earth-Science Reviews, ISSN 0012-8252, E-ISSN 1872-6828, Vol. 117, 29-39 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The principle of isostasy is important in different fields of geosciences. Using an isostatic hypothesis for estimating the crustal thickness suffers from the more or less incomplete isostatic model and that the observed gravity anomaly is not only generated by the topographic/isostatic signal but also by non-isostatic effects (NIEs). In most applications of isostatic models the NIEs are disregarded. In this paper, we study how some isostatic models related with Vening Meinez's isostatic hypothesis can be improved by considering the NIE. The isostatic gravity anomaly needs a correction for the NIEs, which varies from as much as 494 mGal to -308 mGal. The result shows that by adding this correction the global crustal thickness estimate improves about 50% with respect to the global model CRUST2.0, i.e. the root mean square differences of the crustal thickness of the best Vening Meinesz type and CRUST2.0 models are 6.9 and 3.2 km before and after improvement, respectively. As a result, a new global model of crustal thickness using Vening Meinesz and CRUST2.0 models is generated. A comparison with an independent African crustal depth model shows an improvement of the new model by 6.8 km vs. CRUST2.0 (i.e. rms differences of 3.0 and 9.8 km, respectively). A comparison between oceanic lithosphere age and the NIEs is discussed in this study, too. One application of this study can be to improve crustal depth in areas where CRUST2.0 data are sparse and bad and to densify the resolution vs. the CRUST2.0 model. Other applications can be used to infer the viscosity of the mantle from the NIEs signal to study various locations around the Earth for understanding complete, over- and under-compensations of the topography.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 117, 29-39 p.
Keyword [en]
Crust, Disturbing signals, Moho, Non-isostatic effect, Vening Meinesz
National Category
Other Earth and Related Environmental Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-123132DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.12.002ISI: 000316582900002ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84873315690OAI: diva2:625335

QC 20130604

Available from: 2013-06-04 Created: 2013-06-03 Last updated: 2013-06-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bagherbandi, MohammadSjöberg, Lars E.
By organisation
Geodesy and Geoinformatics
In the same journal
Earth-Science Reviews
Other Earth and Related Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 35 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link