Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Improved global crustal thickness modeling based on the VMM isostatic model and non-isostatic gravity correction
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Urban Planning and Environment, Geodesy and Geoinformatics.
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Urban Planning and Environment, Geodesy and Geoinformatics.
2013 (English)In: Journal of Geodynamics, ISSN 0264-3707, Vol. 66, 25-37 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In classical isostatic models for a gravimetric recovery of the Moho parameters (i.e., Moho depths and density contrast) the isostatic gravity anomalies are usually defined based on the assumption that the topographic mass surplus and the ocean mass deficiency are compensated within the Earth's crust. As acquired in this study, this assumption yields large disagreements between isostatic and seismic Moho models. To assess the effects not accounted for in classical isostatic models, we conduct a number of numerical experiments using available global gravity and crustal structure models. First, we compute the gravitational contributions of mass density contrasts due to ice and sediments, and subsequently evaluate respective changes in the Moho geometry. Residual differences between the gravimetric and seismic Moho models are then used to predict a remaining non-isostatic gravity signal, which is mainly attributed to unmodeled density structures and other geophysical phenomena. We utilize three recently developed computational schemes in our numerical studies. The apparatus of spherical harmonic analysis and synthesis is applied in forward modeling of the isostatic gravity disturbances. The Moho depths are estimated globally on a 1 arc-deg equiangular grid by solving the Vening-Meinesz Moritz inverse problem of isostasy. The same estimation model is applied to evaluate the differences between the isostatic and seismic models. We demonstrate that the application of the ice and sediment density contrasts stripping gravity corrections is essential for a more accurate determination of the Moho geometry. We also show that the application of the additional non-isostatic correction further improves the agreement between the Moho models derived based on gravity and seismic data. Our conclusions are based on comparing the gravimetric results with the CRUST2.0 global crustal model compiled using results of seismic surveys.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 66, 25-37 p.
Keyword [en]
Earth's crust, Gravity, Isostasy, Mantle, Mass density, Moho interface
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-123422DOI: 10.1016/j.jog.2013.01.002ISI: 000318381100003ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84874568305OAI: diva2:626708

QC 20130610

Available from: 2013-06-10 Created: 2013-06-10 Last updated: 2013-06-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bagherbandi, MohammadSjöberg, Lars E.
By organisation
Geodesy and Geoinformatics
In the same journal
Journal of Geodynamics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 21 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link