Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
ASSIST as a tool to evaluate course design
KTH, School of Computer Science and Communication (CSC), Media Technology and Interaction Design, MID. KTH, School of Education and Communication in Engineering Science (ECE). Stockholm University.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4221-7326
KTH, School of Computer Science and Communication (CSC), Media Technology and Interaction Design, MID. KTH, School of Education and Communication in Engineering Science (ECE).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5626-1187
Stockholm University.
Stockholm University.
2012 (English)In: Learners in the Driving Seat. Users? - Partners? - Consumers? - Peers? Where are we heading to?: Book of Abstracts / [ed] Morten Flate Paulsen & András Szúcs, 2012, 110-111 p.Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

In order to analyse the course design in two online preparatory university courses in mathematics and programming, a Swedish translation of the short version of the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) was distributed. Four hundred and ninety three students, representing 24 % response rate, participated. The result showed that the mathematics course discouraged students who adopt a deep/strategic approach, while the programming course discouraged students with a deep approach and encouraged students with a surface approach. The indications differences in course design in two online preparatory university courses in mathematics and programming, a Swedish translation of the short version of the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) was distributed to the students participating. The result showed that the mathematics course discouraged students who adopt a deep/strategic approach, while the programming course discouraged students with a deep approach and encouraged students with a surface approach. The indications may beare a contribution to the discussion on disciplinary differences in approaches to studying as well as in disposition of online courses.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. 110-111 p.
Keyword [en]
Approaches to Learning, Online Course Design, Preparatory University Courses
National Category
Learning Other Mathematics Other Computer and Information Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-120714OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-120714DiVA: diva2:627216
Conference
7th EDEN Research Workshop
Note

QC 20130619

Available from: 2013-06-11 Created: 2013-04-15 Last updated: 2013-06-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Book of Abstracts

Authority records BETA

Svedin, MariaBälter, Olle

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Svedin, MariaBälter, Olle
By organisation
Media Technology and Interaction Design, MIDSchool of Education and Communication in Engineering Science (ECE)
LearningOther MathematicsOther Computer and Information Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 577 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf