Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Beyond coercion: moral assessment in the labour market
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Philosophy and History of Technology, Philosophy.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1765-8987
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

 Making moral assessments in the labour market has too often simply been a matter of distinguishing voluntary transactions from coercive ones. For example, some libertarians argue that consent alone makes le-gal transactions in the labour market voluntary and, therefore, morally justified. Some of their critics argue that such an act of consent is no guarantee against coercion. To know whether agreements are voluntary we need to assess the quality of these offers and the quality of the pre-vailing background conditions. To move beyond this stalemate I pro-pose a middle position where the question of voluntariness is put on hold. I argue that ‘libertarian’ consent confers a certain level of legiti-macy to the firm’s offers. However, for these offers to be morally justi-fied they must also possess another quality, though not the one that their critics have suggested; the offers need to be reasonable. Thus, the liber-tarian notion of consent is neither as flawed as its critics have argued nor sufficient to justify transactions in the labour market. An ethical frame-work is suggested which is rooted in a more convincing story of what is morally worrying with a labour market based on libertarian principles.


Keyword [en]
consent, labour market, moral assessment, legitimacy, wrong, exploitation, coercion
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-131266OAI: diva2:655138

QS 2013

Available from: 2013-10-10 Created: 2013-10-10 Last updated: 2013-10-10Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Ethics at work: Two essays on the firm's moral responsibilities towards its employees
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Ethics at work: Two essays on the firm's moral responsibilities towards its employees
2013 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Essay I analyses a sample of corporate codes in the Swedish banking sector. The purpose is to investigate the codes’ ethical status. Are they consistent with the values of fairness or are they instead at a risk of harming the employees? With regard to employees, eight of the nine codes in the material were found to (a) focus one-sidedly on their duties and responsibilities, (b) lack statements regarding their value to the firm, while carefully stating the importance of several other stakeholders, (c) have an anonymous or authoritarian tone, (d) say little regarding the substantial reasons why certain behaviour is forbidden or expected; some of the codes also (e) contained problematic freedom restrictions. The empirical investigation of code content and design leads us to the normative issue of whether such a design can be unfair and risks harming the employees. Departing from the values of equality, reciprocity, care and respect, eight of the nine codes are found to be at risk of being in conflict with these values. The socially responsible firm, which avoids risking employees’ welfare and self-respect, must consider rewriting such corporate codes.

Essay II seeks to provide a richer moral assessment of the transactions, offers and working conditions in the labour market. Some of the most influential accounts have focused on either the act of consent (Nozick), the background conditions (Peter) or the quality of the offers (Olsaretti). I argue that all these aspects are ethically relevant and necessary to make agreements morally justified. This leads me to the conclusion that (a) unreasonable offers remain ethically flawed regardless of employees’ consent and adequate background conditions; (b) the mere act of consent is, nonetheless, ethically valuable; (c) there exist different kinds of demands, affected differently by whether they are properly consented to. Then, in a well-ordered liberal democracy (which constitute the necessary background conditions), to ascertain whether a firm’s offers and working conditions are morally sound, we need to know both their quality (how reasonable they are) and whether they have been properly consented to. A firm ends up with three moral responsibilities: (i) not to exploit the workers’ disadvantaged position in the labour market, which requires that they are offered only reasonable proposals, (ii) to inform employees in the contract situation of all the relevant aspects and working conditions associated with the job, thereby enabling proper consent, and (iii) once the worker is employed, to only implement working conditions of the kind that are possible to justify and consistent with treating the employees as persons.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2013. 42 p.
Theses in philosophy from the Royal Institute of Technology, ISSN 1650-8831 ; 44
ethics, employees, consent, moral responsiblitiy, codes of ethics, philosophy
National Category
Philosophy, Ethics and Religion
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-129983 (URN)978-91-7501-872-0 (ISBN)
2013-10-28, 231, Teknikringen 78B, KTH, Stockholm, 13:00 (English)

QC 20131010

Available from: 2013-10-10 Created: 2013-10-07 Last updated: 2013-10-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Munter, Dan
By organisation

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 51 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link