Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Improved model quality assessment using ProQ2
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Theoretical Physics. KTH, Centres, SeRC - Swedish e-Science Research Centre.
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Theoretical Physics, Theoretical & Computational Biophysics. KTH, Centres, SeRC - Swedish e-Science Research Centre.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2734-2794
2012 (English)In: BMC Bioinformatics, ISSN 1471-2105, Vol. 13, no 1, 224- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Employing methods to assess the quality of modeled protein structures is now standard practice in bioinformatics. In a broad sense, the techniques can be divided into methods relying on consensus prediction on the one hand, and single-model methods on the other. Consensus methods frequently perform very well when there is a clear consensus, but this is not always the case. In particular, they frequently fail in selecting the best possible model in the hard cases (lacking consensus) or in the easy cases where models are very similar. In contrast, single-model methods do not suffer from these drawbacks and could potentially be applied on any protein of interest to assess quality or as a scoring function for sampling-based refinement.Results: Here, we present a new single-model method, ProQ2, based on ideas from its predecessor, ProQ. ProQ2 is a model quality assessment algorithm that uses support vector machines to predict local as well as global quality of protein models. Improved performance is obtained by combining previously used features with updated structural and predicted features. The most important contribution can be attributed to the use of profile weighting of the residue specific features and the use features averaged over the whole model even though the prediction is still local.Conclusions: ProQ2 is significantly better than its predecessors at detecting high quality models, improving the sum of Z-scores for the selected first-ranked models by 20% and 32% compared to the second-best single-model method in CASP8 and CASP9, respectively. The absolute quality assessment of the models at both local and global level is also improved. The Pearson's correlation between the correct and local predicted score is improved from 0.59 to 0.70 on CASP8 and from 0.62 to 0.68 on CASP9; for global score to the correct GDT_TS from 0.75 to 0.80 and from 0.77 to 0.80 again compared to the second-best single methods in CASP8 and CASP9, respectively. ProQ2 is available at

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 13, no 1, 224- p.
Keyword [en]
Consensus methods, Global levels, Global quality, Global score, High quality, Model quality assessments, Protein models, Protein structures, Quality assessment, Sampling-based, Scoring functions, Standard practices, Z-scores
National Category
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Bioinformatics (Computational Biology)
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-131356DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-224ISI: 000315639000001PubMedID: 22963006ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84865844930OAI: diva2:656516
Swedish Research Council, 2010-5107 2010-491Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research Swedish e‐Science Research Center

QC 20131016

Available from: 2013-10-16 Created: 2013-10-14 Last updated: 2013-10-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ray, ArjunLindahl, Erik
By organisation
Theoretical PhysicsSeRC - Swedish e-Science Research CentreTheoretical & Computational Biophysics
In the same journal
BMC Bioinformatics
Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyBioinformatics (Computational Biology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 42 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link