Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Public Participation-Potential and Pitfalls
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Philosophy and History of Technology, Philosophy.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0071-3919
2013 (English)In: Social and Ethical Aspects of Radiation Risk Management, Volume 19 (Radioactivity in the Environment), Elsevier, 2013, p. 333-345Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The importance of stakeholder participation in activities that give rise to radiation exposure has repeatedly been emphasized. However, it is often unclear why participation is undertaken and what its purpose is. In this chapter, participation is discussed from the viewpoint of democratic theory. Democratic decision-making has to take place in stable units such as nations and regions. Often, the group of persons affected by a particular decision does not coincide with any of these units. In such cases, other means are needed to ensure that those affected are involved in the decision-making process and have a real influence on its outcome. To achieve this, participatory procedures are needed. This means that such procedures are a necessary component in a well-functioning democracy, making up for the misfit between decision-making units and the groups affected by many decisions. Based on this analysis, five quality criteria for participatory procedures in a democratic society are proposed: representativeness, transparency, impact on the decision, early involvement, and full access to expert knowledge.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2013. p. 333-345
Series
Radioactivity in the Environment, ISSN 1569-4860 ; 19
Keywords [en]
Democracy, Experts, Participation, Procedural justice, Representation, Science-policy relationship, Stakeholders, Transparency
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-133374DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-045015-5.00018-6Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84883509536ISBN: 978-0-08-045015-5 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-133374DiVA, id: diva2:661642
Note

QC 20131104

Available from: 2013-11-04 Created: 2013-10-31 Last updated: 2013-11-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hansson, Sven Ove
By organisation
Philosophy
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 113 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf