Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Explanation and prediction in technology education
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Philosophy and History of Technology, Philosophy.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7778-2552
2013 (English)In: Technology teachers as researchers: Philosophical and Empirical Technology Education Studies in the Swedish TUFF Research School / [ed] Inga-Britt Skogh, Marc J. de Vries, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2013, 33-51 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

An explanation improves understanding. In technology education, explanations are needed to increase pupils' understanding of for example technical mechanisms, artefact functions, and how technology affects society and the sciences. Explanations in technology differ from those in science due to the great importance of intentions and normative characteristics in technology. In this article, a classification system for explanations in technology education is sketched. Explanations are classified according to the characteristics of their explananda (what they are to explain), how they are presented, and what kinds of models they utilise. They are evaluated according to whether their contents fulfil their purpose, and how well they suit their audience.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2013. 33-51 p.
Series
International technology education studies, 12
Keyword [en]
technology education, epistemology of technology, modelling, explanation
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-136233ISBN: 978-94-6209-441-3 (print)ISBN: 978-94-6209-442-0 (print)ISBN: 978-94-6209-443-7 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-136233DiVA: diva2:675624
Note

QC 20140224

Available from: 2013-12-04 Created: 2013-12-04 Last updated: 2014-05-12Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Technological knowledge and technology education
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Technological knowledge and technology education
2014 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Technological knowledge is of many different kinds, from experience-based know-how in the crafts to science-based knowledge in modern engineering. It is inherently oriented towards being useful in technological activities, such as manufacturing and engineering design.

The purpose of this thesis is to highlight special characteristics of technological knowledge and how these affect how technology should be taught in school. It consists of an introduction, a summary in Swedish, and five papers:

Paper I is about rules of thumb, which are simple instructions, used to guide actions toward a specific result, without need of advanced knowledge. One off the major advantages of rules of thumb is the ease with which they can be learnt. One of their major disadvantages is that they cannot easily be adjusted to new situations or conditions.

Paper II describes how Gilbert Ryle's distinction between knowing how and knowing that is applicable in the technological domain. Knowing how and knowing that are commonly used together, but there are important differences between them which motivate why they should be regarded as different types: they are learnt in different ways, justified in different ways, and knowing that is susceptible to Gettier type problems which technological knowing how is not.

Paper III is based on a survey about how Swedish technology teachers understand the concept of technological knowledge. Their opinions show an extensive variation, and they have no common terminology for describing the knowledge.

Paper IV deals with non-scientific models that are commonly used by engineers, based on for example folk theories or obsolete science. These should be included in technology education if it is to resemble real technology. Different, and partly contradictory, epistemological frameworks must be used in different school subjects. This leads to major pedagogical challenges, but also to opportunities to clarify the differences between technology and the natural sciences and between models and reality.

Paper V is about explanation, prediction, and the use of models in technology education. Explanations and models in technology differ from those in the natural sciences in that they have to include users' actions and intentions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2014. vi, 52 p.
Series
Theses in philosophy from the Royal Institute of Technology, ISSN 1650-8831 ; 48
Keyword
philosophy of technology, epistemology of technology, technology education, technological knowledge, rule of thumb, explanation
National Category
Philosophy
Research subject
Philosophy
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-144875 (URN)978-91-7595-078-5 (ISBN)
Public defence
2014-06-03, Kollegiesalen, Brinellvägen 8, KTH, Stockholm, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

QC 20140512

Available from: 2014-05-12 Created: 2014-04-30 Last updated: 2014-05-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Norström, Per

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Norström, Per
By organisation
Philosophy
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 123 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf