Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Variation in LCA results for disposable polystyrene beverage cups due to multiple data sets and modelling choices
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering, Environmental Strategies Research (fms).
2014 (English)In: Environmental Modelling & Software, ISSN 1364-8152, Vol. 51, 123-135 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) of the same products often result in different, sometimes even contradictory outcomes. Reasons for these differences include using different data sets and deviating modelling choices. This paper purposely used different data sets and modelling choices to identify how these differences propagated in LCA results. Vehicle for this methodological exploration was an LCA case study of a typical polystyrene (PS) disposable cup. An initial LCA of PS cups was made using only one data set per process. Contribution and sensitivity analysis identified those processes with influential contribution to the overall environmental impact. Next additional data sets were acquired for all influential processes. The spread in impact results for each life cycle process was calculated after impact assessment for each individual inventory data set as to preserve the correlation between inventory data within each individual data set. The spread in impact results reflects uncertainty existing between different data sets for the same process and due to modelling choices. The influence on overall LCA results was quantified by systematically applying all combinations of data sets and modelling choices. Results from the different data sets and modelling choices systematically point to the same processes as main contributors to all impact categories (PS production, cup manufacturing, PS incineration and PS recycling). The spread in toxicity indicators exceeds the energy-related impact categories. Causes of spread are resources and energy used (type, amount, date and origin), reported emissions, and applied allocation procedures. Average LCA results show slight preference for recycling PS compared to incineration in most impact categories. Overlapping spread in results of the two waste treatments, however, does not support the preference for recycling. The approach in this paper showed how variation in data sets and modelling choices propagates in LCA outcomes. This is especially useful for generic LCAs as systematic use of multiple data sets and multiple modelling choices increases the insight in relative contributions of processes to, and uncertainty in the overall LCA. These results might be less easy to perceive, but they provide decision makers with more robust information.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 51, 123-135 p.
Keyword [en]
Life Cycle Assessment, Multiple data sets, Modelling choices, Polystyrene, Disposable cups, Uncertainty and variability
National Category
Other Environmental Engineering
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-141068DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.014ISI: 000329561100011ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84886284647OAI: diva2:695497

QC 20140211

Available from: 2014-02-11 Created: 2014-02-07 Last updated: 2014-02-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Potting, Josepha
By organisation
Environmental Strategies Research (fms)
In the same journal
Environmental Modelling & Software
Other Environmental Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 92 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link